Cited by 99Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life ManagementYeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesFungal Plant Pathogen Control

Yeasts isolated from figs (Ficus carica L.) as biocontrol agents of postharvest fruit diseases

Ruiz-Moyano, S., Martín, A., Villalobos, M.C., Calle, A., Serradilla, M.J., Córdoba, M.G., Hernández, A.·2016·Food Microbiology

Abstract

Fresh fruit is highly perishable during postharvest life, mainly due to fungal growth. Thus, fungal control is an important goal for the fruit industry. In this work, a selection of antagonistic yeasts isolated from fig and breba crops were screened in vitro. The isolated yeasts were challenged with three moulds isolated from decayed figs and breba crops, identified as Penicillium expansum M639 and Cladosporium cladosporioides M310 and M624, and pathogenic moulds Botrytis cinerea CECT20518 and Monilia laxa CA1 from culture collections. Two yeast isolates, Hanseniaspora opuntiae L479 and Metschnikowia pulcherrima L672, were selected for their ability to inhibit the growth of aforementioned moulds. These yeasts reduced the radial growth of moulds on PDA by between 45.23% and 66.09%. Antagonistic activity was associated with the interaction of live yeast cells with moulds. M. pulcherrima L672 apparently parasitised C. cladosporioides isolates. In addition, challenges were assayed using wounded apples and nectarines, with significant reductions in percent infection and lesion size for all moulds tested. To our knowledge, this is the first report identifying H. opuntiae as an antagonist against different pathogenic moulds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fm.2016.01.003

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruiz-Moyano, S., Martín, A., Villalobos, M. C., Calle, A., Serradilla, M. J., Córdoba, M. G., & Hernández, A.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Extremadura (ES)
  • Centro de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas de Extremadura (ES)
Corresponding author
Hernández, A.
Venue
Food Microbiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-08
Volume
57
Pages
45-53
ISSN
0740-0020 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2233410648
Cited by
99
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
8.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (RTA2010-00123-C02-02)
  • Extremadura Government (AGA015)
  • Extremadura Regional Government (Spain) (PD10140)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
antagonistic yeasts, biological control agents, figs, Ficus carica, postharvest fruit disease, Penicillium expansum, Cladosporium cladosporioides, Botrytis cinerea, Hanseniaspora opuntiae, Metschnikowia pulcherrima, fungal degradation, nectarine, parasitism
MeSH terms
Antibiosis, Candida, Fruit, Penicillium, Plant Diseases, Yeasts, Botrytis, Malus, Ficus, Plant Nectar

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review