Cited by 35

Chickpea as a promising ingredient substitute in gluten-free bread making: An overview of technological and nutritional benefits

Vinod, B R, Asrey, Ram, Rudra, Shalini Gaur, Urhe, Sumit B., Mishra, Shatakashi·2023·Food Chemistry Advances

Abstract

The growing awareness amongst consumers regarding health and wellness has changed the dynamics of the food industry. Owing to the burgeoning of lifestyle diseases the demand for gluten-free (GF) products has skyrocketed. Traditionally, bread is made with gluten-rich flour, which gives it unique texture and flavour. However, a segment of the population with gluten intolerance seeks nutritious and tasty GF alternatives. While maize flour, cassava flour, and rice flour have been explored, they pose technological challenges in the fabrication of gluten-free bread (GFB). This review focuses on Chickpea flour (CF) as a promising alternative for GFB, offering improved technological, functional, nutritional, and sensory attributes. CF is rich in proteins, vitamins, and dietary fibres, with potential preventive benefits against cancer and cardiovascular diseases. Incorporating CF in GFB enhances dough stability, consistency, and loaf volume while reducing the glycemic response. It opens up the possibility of nutritionally enriched, healthier, and more delicious GFB options for those with gluten intolerance, making it a highly promising ingredient for satisfying modern food demands.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.focha.2023.100473

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Vinod, B. R., Asrey, R., Rudra, S. G., Urhe, S. B., & Mishra, S.
Venue
Food Chemistry Advances
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-12
Volume
3
Pages
100473
ISSN
2772-753X
Cited by
35
References
2
Language
en
Funders
Indian Council of Agricultural Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review