Cited by 150Food and Agricultural SciencesMeat and Animal Product QualityDye analysis and toxicity

Nitrate and nitrite quantification from cured meat and vegetables and their estimated dietary intake in Australians

Hsu, James, Arcot, Jayashree, Alice Lee, N.·2009·Food Chemistry

Abstract

High dietary nitrate and nitrite intake may increase the risk of gastro-intestinal cancers due to the in vivo formation of carcinogenic chemicals known as N-nitroso compounds. Water and leafy vegetables are natural sources of dietary nitrate, whereas cured meats are the major sources of dietary nitrite. This paper describes a simple and fast analytical method for determining nitrate and nitrite contents in vegetables and meat, using reversed-phase HPLC-UV. The linearity R ² value was >0.998 for the anions. The limits of quantification for nitrite and nitrate were 5.0 and 2.5mg/kg, respectively. This method is applicable for both leafy vegetable and meat samples. A range of vegetables was tested, which contained <23mg/kg nitrite, but as much as 5000mg/kg of nitrate. In cured and fresh meat samples, nitrate content ranged from 3.7 to 139.5mg/kg, and nitrite content ranged from 3.7 to 86.7mg/kg. These were below the regulatory limits set by food standards Australia and New Zealand (FSANZ). Based on the average consumption of these vegetables and cured meat in Australia, the estimated dietary intake for nitrate and nitrite for Australians were 267 and 5.3mg/adult/day, respectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.11.081

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The dose of nitrite used in that animal study was 250-350 mg/kg/day, which was too high to compare with those achieved in standard human diets.

    “However, the dose of nitrite used in that study was 250–350 mg/kg/day, which was too high to compare with those achieved in standard human diets [113].”

    From NO-Rich Diet for Lifestyle-Related Diseases (2015) · cites this paper as [113]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hsu, J., Arcot, J., & Alice Lee, N.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Arcot, Jayashree
Venue
Food Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-07
Volume
115
Issue
1
Pages
334-339
ISSN
0308-8146 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003363212
Cited by
150
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
8.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Dye analysis and toxicity
Keywords
dietary nitrate, dietary nitrite, cured meat, leafy vegetables, N-nitroso compounds, nitrate determination, nitrite determination, HPLC-UV method, food standards compliance, Australian consumers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review