Cited by 36Microencapsulation and Drying ProcessesFood Chemistry and Fat AnalysisFermentation and Sensory Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence of polyols and bulking agents on flavour release from low-viscosity solutions

Siefarth, Caroline, Tyapkova, Oxana, Beauchamp, Jonathan, Schweiggert, Ute, Buettner, Andrea, Bader, Stephanie·2011·Food Chemistry

Abstract

The release of four volatile flavour compounds (cis-3-hexen-1-ol, benzaldehyde, ethyl butanoate and butylisovalerate) from pure water and various low-viscosity aqueous solutions (sucrose, maltitol, erythritol, polydextrose and oligofructose, each at 20% (w/w)) was investigated. Dynamic headspace concentrations of the flavour compounds at thermodynamic equilibrium were monitored by proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS). The rheological properties of the solutions were characterised by their viscosity. Flavour release from pure water increased with increasing hydrophobicity and volatility of the flavour compounds. The highly volatile compounds were retained more extensively in the presence of sucrose, polyols and bulking agents, compared to in pure water, whereas an increase in the release of the less volatile cis-3-hexen-1-ol was observed. All aqueous solutions had similar viscosities, although bulking agent solutions tended to have higher viscosities than polyol solutions of the same concentration. A correlation between viscosity and flavour release in the low-viscosity solutions was not evident.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.05.115

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 28 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 36

Metadata

Authors
Siefarth, C., Tyapkova, O., Beauchamp, J., Schweiggert, U., Buettner, A., & Bader, S.
Affiliations
  • Fraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging (DE)
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
Venue
Food Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
129
Issue
4
Pages
1462-1468
ISSN
0308-8146 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051301512
Cited by
36
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cargill
  • Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Microencapsulation and Drying Processes
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
Keywords
flavor release, volatile flavor compounds, sugar alcohols, bulking agents, cis-3-hexen-1-ol, benzaldehyde, ethyl butanoate, sucrose, maltitol, erythritol, polydextrose, fructooligosaccharides, viscosity, hydrophobicity, flavor retention, headspace concentration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review