Edible insects: an alternative of nutritional, functional and bioactive compounds.
Abstract
The ingestion of insects has become a new trend in food science approximately since 2013, when the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) published a document entitled "Edible Insects: Future Perspectives of Food and Nutrition Security". Since then, a growing number of researches relating insects as a food source has emerged, however, little is known about the composition of their nutrients. This review describes and compares the nutritional composition, functionality and the bioactive compounds present in different insects, as these have been shown to be a source of healthy food with high protein content, significant amount of lipids, vitamins, minerals and fibers, present in the form of chitin in the exoskeleton of the insects. Additionally, the issues related to entomophagy and the possible risks that should be taken into account when consuming insects are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Insect bioactive peptides and lipids have beneficial effects on human health, such as antioxidant, antimicrobial, and antidiabetic properties, angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibition activity, and effects against inflammation and cancer.
“The insect bioactive peptides and lipids have beneficial effects on human health, such as antioxidant, antimicrobial and antidiabetic properties, angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition activity, effects against inflammation and cancer.”
From Insect Derived Lauric Acid as Promising Alternative Strategy to Antibiotics in the Antimicrobial Resistance Scenario (2021) · cites this paper as da Silva Lucas et al., 2020
Cites
Qualidade nutricional e escore químico de aminoácidos de diferentes fontes protéicas
Pires, C. V., Oliveira, M. G. D. A., Rosa, J. C., & Costa, N. M. B. (2006) · Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos · doi:10.1590/s0101-20612006000100029 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Borrelli, L., Varriale, L., Dipineto, L., Pace, A., Menna, L. F., & Fioretti, A. (2021) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.620798 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jantzen da Silva Lucas, A., Menegon de Oliveira, L., da Rocha, M., & Prentice, C.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (BR)
- ORCID
- Prentice, Carlos
- Venue
- Food Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 311
- Pages
- 126022
- ISSN
- 0308-8146 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2995179147
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 40 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 14
- FWCI
- 3.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (001)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Utilization and Effects
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
- Keywords
- edible insects, entomophagy, nutritional composition, functional compounds, bioactive compounds, protein content, chitin, insect lipids, vitamins and minerals, dietary fiber, food safety risk, nutrition security
- MeSH terms
- Edible Insects, Agriculture, Amino Acids, Animals, Dietary Proteins, Food Supply, Food Technology, Humans, Insecta, Lipids, Minerals, Nutritive Value, Risk, Vitamins, Insect Proteins, Food Safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review