The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development and validation of a scale to capture social desirability in food safety culture
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This observed gap between knowledge (and, in some cases, attitudes) and practices may partly reflect reporting bias, including social desirability bias, whereby respondents underreport undesirable behaviours and overreport socially acceptable practices [75].”
From Food Safety Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices (KAP) of Urban Consumers in Low-Income and Lower-Middle-Income Countries (LLMICs): A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as [75]
In the citing paper
“Food safety knowledge or attitudes were found to be adequate or satisfactory, suggesting a gap in translation of knowledge and attitudes into practice, possibly from bias due to social desirability (tendency to underreport socially undesirable attitudes and practices, and to over report more desirable attributes) (Jespersen, MacLaurin, & Vlerick, 2017).”
From Food safety-related perspectives and practices of consumers and vendors in Ethiopia: A scoping review. (2022) · cites this paper as Jespersen, MacLaurin, & Vlerick, 2017
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,882
Organizational culture and leadership
(1993) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(93)90120-5 · Cited by 16,530
A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960) · Journal of Consulting Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0047358 · Cited by 8,686
Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes
(1991) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-07551-2 · Cited by 3,240
Two-component models of socially desirable responding.
Paulhus, D. L. (1984) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598 · Cited by 3,013
Corporate Culture and Organizational Effectiveness
Fondas, N., & Denison, D. R. (1991) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258613 · Cited by 1,546
Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding.
Paulhus, D. L., & Reid, D. B. (1991) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.307 · Cited by 824
Edwards, A. L. (1953) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0058073 · Cited by 653
A General Measure of Ecological Behavior 1
Kaiser, F. G. (1998) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01712.x · Cited by 563
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 2013, Vol. 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Insfran-Rivarola, A., Tlapa, D., Limon-Romero, J., Baez-Lopez, Y., Miranda-Ackerman, M., Arredondo-Soto, K., & Ontiveros, S. (2020) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods9091169 · Cited by 160
Parikh, P., Aparo, N. O., Nordhagen, S., & De Steur, H. (2022) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111376 · Cited by 32
Choudhury, S., Medina-Lara, A., Bi, A. Z., Ricarte, P., Morrish, N., & Veettil, P. C. (2026) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods15081381 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Jespersen, L., MacLaurin, T., & Vlerick, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Guelph (CA)
- Ghent University (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Jespersen, Lone
- Venue
- Food Control
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-12
- Volume
- 82
- Pages
- 42-47
- ISSN
- 0956-7135 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2622718899
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 4.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Food Control (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Occupational Health and Safety Research
- Keywords
- food safety culture, social desirability bias, self-assessment scale, scale development, scale validation, measurement reliability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
