The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Determination of sulfur dioxide in food by liquid chromatography with pre-column derivatization
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pre-column derivatization improves the sensitivity of liquid chromatography for the determination of sulfur dioxide in foods.
“Furthermore, a recent study used pre-column derivatization to improve the sensitivity of liquid chromatography for the determination of sulfur dioxide in foods [107] (Table 3).”
From Current Status and Future Trends in Removal, Control, and Mitigation of Algae Food Safety Risks for Human Consumption (2022) · cites this paper as [107]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Mu, L., Li, G., Kang, Q., Xu, Y., Fu, Y., & Ye, L.
- Affiliations
- Changchun University (CN)
- Institute of Vegetables and Flowers (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Gang
- Venue
- Food Control
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-02
- Volume
- 132
- Pages
- 108500
- ISSN
- 0956-7135 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3194666087
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Food Control (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Education Department of Jilin Province (- JJKH20210616KJ)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
- Keywords
- sulfur dioxide, food analysis, pre-column derivatization, o-phthalaldehyde, fluorescent derivatization, fluorescence detection, food preservatives
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
