The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Probiotic edible films as a new strategy for developing functional bakery products: The case of pan bread
Open accessAbstract
In the present paper, a novel approach for the development of probiotic baked cereal products is presented. Probiotic pan bread constructed by the application of film forming solutions based either on individual hydrogels e.g. 1% w/w sodium alginate (ALG) or binary blends of 0.5% w/w sodium alginate and 2% whey protein concentrate (ALG/WPC) containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, followed by an air drying step at 60 °C for 10 min or 180 °C for min were produced. No visual differences between the bread crust surface of control and probiotic bread were observed. Microstructural analysis of bread crust revealed the formation of thicker films in the case of ALG/WPC. The presence of WPC improved significantly the viability of L. rhamnosus GG throughout air drying and room temperature storage. During storage there was a significant reduction in L. rhamnosus GG viability during the first 24 h, viable count losses were low during the subsequent 2–3 days of storage and growth was observed upon the last days of storage (day 4–7). The use of film forming solutions based exclusive on sodium alginate improved the viability of L. rhamnosus GG under simulated gastro-intestinal conditions, and there was no impact of the bread crust matrix on inactivation rates. The presence of the probiotic edible films did not modify cause major shifts in the mechanistic pathway of bread staling – as shown by physicochemical, thermal, texture and headspace analysis. Based on our calculations, an individual 30–40 g bread slice can deliver approx. 7.57–8.98 and 6.55–6.91 log cfu/portion before and after in-vitro digestion, meeting the WHO recommended required viable cell counts for probiotic bacteria to be delivered to the human host.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Terpou, A., Papadaki, A., Lappa, I., Kachrimanidou, V., Bosnea, L., & Kopsahelis, N. (2019) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu11071591 · Cited by 779
Alginate: From Food Industry to Biomedical Applications and Management of Metabolic Disorders
Gheorghita Puscaselu, R., Lobiuc, A., Dimian, M., & Covasa, M. (2020) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym12102417 · Cited by 470
Edible Films and Coatings as Food-Quality Preservers: An Overview
Díaz-Montes, E., & Castro-Muñoz, R. (2021) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods10020249 · Cited by 469
Metadata
- Authors
- Soukoulis, C., Yonekura, L., Gan, H.-H., Behboudi-Jobbehdar, S., Parmenter, C., & Fisk, I.
- Venue
- Food Hydrocolloids
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-08
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 100
- Pages
- 231-242
- ISSN
- 0268-005X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999685558
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probiotic edible films as a new strategy for developing functional bakery products: The case of pan bread. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.01.023
- The paper
- Soukoulis, C., Yonekura, L., Gan, H.-H., Behboudi-Jobbehdar, S., Parmenter, C., & Fisk, I. (2014). Probiotic edible films as a new strategy for developing functional bakery products: The case of pan bread. Food Hydrocolloids. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.01.023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.