Preparation of physically modified oat starch with different sonication treatments
Abstract
Oat starch granules were subjected to ultrasound treatment using either a 20 kHz horn sonicator at intensities of 39, 48, 63 W/cm2 or an ultrasound bath operating at an intensity of 5 W/cm2 for 10 and 20 min. Morphological, structural and functional properties of native and sonicated samples were investigated. SEM micrographs revealed the presence of fissures and pores on the surface of starch granules treated with the horn sonicator. An obvious size reduction was also observed at the highest sonication intensity. Ultrasound treatment increased the amylose content, swelling power, solubility, Transmittance, water, and lipid holding capacity; while the gel hardness diminished after sonication. The syneresis results revealed that higher amounts of water were expelled from the sonicated starch gels during 5 days of storage as compared to the native counterpart. The onset, peak and conclusion temperatures of gelatinization increased; while, the gelatinization temperature range decreased due to sonication. A decrease in the degree of crystallinity as well as the enthalpy of gelatinization demonstrated that the crystalline structures of oat starch granules were destroyed to some extent upon sonication, while the A-type crystalline pattern remained unchanged.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ultrasound can cleave amylose chains, which are more prone to disruption than amylopectin, thereby releasing soluble polymers into the aqueous phase.
“Ultrasound can cleave amylose chains, which are more prone to disruption than amylopectin, thereby releasing soluble polymers into the aqueous phase”
From Ultrasonication-induced modifications in functional, thermal, and structural properties of chickpea flour under different time and temperature conditions (2027) · cites this paper as Falsafi et al., 2019
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Farrokhi, M., Brandão, T. R. S., Gonçalves, E. M., & Silva, C. L. M. (2027) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2026.113096
- Authors
- Falsafi, S. R., Maghsoudlou, Y., Rostamabadi, H., Rostamabadi, M. M., Hamedi, H., & Hosseini, S. M. H.
- Venue
- Food Hydrocolloids
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 89
- Pages
- 311-320
- ISSN
- 0268-005X
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review