Cited by 63

Improved enzymatic accessibility of peanut protein isolate pre-treated using thermosonication

Chen, Lin, Ettelaie, Rammile, Akhtar, Mahmood·2019·Food Hydrocolloids

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.02.050

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The amide I region at 1600-1700 cm−1 is highly sensitive to changes in protein secondary structure and can be used to assess variations in α-helix, β-sheet, β-turn, and random coil structures.

    “Previous studies have also indicated that the amide I region at 1600-1700 cm 1 is highly sensitive to changes in protein secondary structure and can be used to assess variations in α -helix, β -sheet, β -turn, and random coil structures (L. Chen et al., 2019; Tong et al., 2022).”

    From Heat-induced gelation of ultrasonically extracted saline-alkali-grown soybean protein: Correlation between protein conformation and gel functional behavior (2027) · cites this paper as L. Chen et al., 2019

    No passage in our indexed copy addresses the amide I region or its use to assess α-helix, β-sheet, β-turn, and random-coil structures. Searches for the wavenumber range, amide I, FTIR, and secondary structure returned no relevant passage; the only result for “structure” was a recent-citations entry, not evidence for this claim. (LLM, conf=0.71)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, L., Ettelaie, R., & Akhtar, M.
Venue
Food Hydrocolloids
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
93
Pages
308-316
ISSN
0268-005X
Cited by
63
References
1
Language
en
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (31601416)
  • Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology (2016A020210113, 2017A020208064)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review