Cited by 4

Interfacial and bulk stabilization mechanisms of particulate and fibrillar quinoa protein aggregates in high internal phase emulsions

Zhang, Chi, Chen, Longwei, Wu, Chaosheng, Wang, Wei, Zhou, Xilong, Tang, Xiaozhi, Feng, Xiao·2026·Food Hydrocolloids

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2026.112912

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Overall, submicron particles and microgels are usually the more robust route for Pickering, HIPEs and emulsion-gel structuring, while nanoparticles are preferable to fine emulsions with rapid adsorption.

    “Overall, submicron particles and microgels are usually the more robust route for Pickering, HIPEs and emulsion-gel structuring, while nanoparticles are preferable to fine emulsions with rapid adsorption (Zhang et al., 2026; Luo et al., 2022).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Zhang, C., Chen, L., Wu, C., Wang, W., Zhou, X., Tang, X., & Feng, X.
Venue
Food Hydrocolloids
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-11
Volume
180
Pages
112912
ISSN
0268-005X
Cited by
4
References
1
Language
en
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC32372380)
  • Outstanding Youth Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China (BK20240143)
  • Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  • Shanghai Municipal State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (2022013)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review