The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Greenhouse gas emissions of food waste disposal options for UK retailers
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“It is worth noting that preventing food becoming wasted (e.g. via preventing food waste at source, feeding to other people, etc.) may be more effective than diverting food that has already been categorised as waste away from landfill and incineration to other waste destinations higher up the food waste hierarchy (e.g. composting, anaerobic digestion).”
From Review: Consumption-stage food waste reduction interventions – What works and how to design better interventions (2019) · cites this paper as Moult et al., 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“For example, landfills and composting generate large amounts of greenhouse gases and lead to the eutrophication and acidification of ecosystems (Arafat et al. 2015;Moult et al. 2018).”
From Recycling municipal, agricultural and industrial waste into energy, fertilizers, food and construction materials, and economic feasibility: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Moult et al. 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
Paustian, K. H., Ravindranath, N. H., & van Amstel, A. R. (2006) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · Cited by 6,706
Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL
(2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197610145.001.0001 · Cited by 5,942
Banks, C. J., Chesshire, M., Heaven, S., & Arnold, R. (2010) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.005 · Cited by 384
Carbon footprint of food waste management options in the waste hierarchy – a Swedish case study
Eriksson, M., Strid, I., & Hansson, P.-A. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.026 · Cited by 304
Wadhwa, M., Bakshi, M. P. S., & Makkar, H. P. S. (2013) · Cited by 284
Kim, M.-H., & Kim, J.-W. (2010) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.04.049 · Cited by 255
Mitigating the greenhouse gas emissions embodied in food through realistic consumer choices
Hoolohan, C., Berners-Lee, M., McKinstry-West, J., & HEWITT, C. N. (2013) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.046 · Cited by 212
Self-citationGaseous emissions from management of solid waste: a systematic review
Pardo, G. O., Moral, R., Aguilera, E., & del Prado, A. (2014) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12806 · Cited by 172
Takata, M., Fukushima, K., Kimata-Kino, N., Nagao, N., Niwa, C., & Toda, T. (2012) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.05.049 · Cited by 142
Valorisation of food waste to produce new raw materials for animal feed
San Martin, D., Ramos, S., & Zufía, J. (2016) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.11.035 · Cited by 142
Comparative life cycle assessment of different municipal solid waste management scenarios in Iran
Rajaeifar, M. A., Tabatabaei, M., Ghanavati, H., Khoshnevisan, B., & Rafiee, S. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.037 · Cited by 117
A comparative assessment of waste incinerators in the UK
Nixon, J. D., Wright, D. G., Dey, P. K., Ghosh, S. K., & Davies, P. A. (2013) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2013.08.001 · Cited by 80
Ariunbaatar, J., Esposito, G., Yeh, D. H., & Lens, P. N. L. (2016) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2016.00008 · Cited by 75
Carlsson, M., Narožnova, I., Møller, J., Scheutz, C., & Lagerkvist, A. (2015) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.06.012 · Cited by 54
Biocycle anaerobic digester: performance and benefits
Banks, C. J., Chesshire, M., Heaven, S., Arnold, R., & Lewis, L. (2011) · Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Waste and Resource Management · doi:10.1680/warm.2011.164.3.141 · Cited by 12
Nilsson, H. (2013) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · Cited by 10
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- European Commission, 2008/98/EC. Commission Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives. Official Journal of the European Union, Volume 312, p. 3–30.
- European Commission, No 1069/2009. Commission Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009. Official Journal of the European Union, Volume 300. p. 1–33.
- European Commission, No 1169/2011. Commission Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers.... Official Journal of the European Union, 25 10, Volume 304, p. 18–63.
- European Commission, No 142/2011. Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 of 25 February 2011. Official Journal of the European Union, 25 02, Volume 54, pp. 1–254.
- European Commission, No 68/2013. Commission Regulation (EU) No 68/2013 of 16 January 2013 on the Catalogue of feed materials. Official Journal of the European Union, 16 01, Volume 29, pp. 1–64.
- IPCC, 2007. Contribution of Working Group Iii to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. [Metz, B., Davidson, O. R., Bosch, P. R., Dave, R., Meyer, L. A. (Editors)], Cambridge, UK and New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
- Kool, A., Marinussen, M. & Blonk, H., 2012. LCI data for the calculation tool Feedprint for greenhouse gas emissions of feed production and utilization. GHG Emissions of N, P and K fertilizer production, Blonk Consultants: (Ed.).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reynolds, C., Goucher, L., Quested, T., Bromley, S., Gillick, S., Wells, V. K., Evans, D., Koh, L., Carlsson Kanyama, A., Katzeff, C., et al. (2019) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.01.009 · Cited by 487
Roy, P., Mohanty, A. K., Dick, P., & Misra, M. (2023) · ACS Environmental Au · doi:10.1021/acsenvironau.2c00050 · Cited by 421
Food waste to biochars through pyrolysis: A review
Elkhalifa, S., Al‐Ansari, T. A., Mackey, H. R., & McKay, G. (2019) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.024 · Cited by 381
Peng, X., Jiang, Y., Chen, Z., Osman, A. I., Farghali, M., Rooney, D. W., & Yap, P.-S. (2023) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-022-01551-5 · Cited by 333
“Thus, animal feed practitioners unanimously favor food waste as a research area for sustainable animal nutrition to advance animal husbandry (Mourad 2016).”
BackgroundAssessing the vulnerability of food supply chains to climate change-induced disruptions
Tchonkouang, R. D., Onyeaka, H. N., & Nkoutchou, H. (2024) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171047 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Moult, J. A., Allan, S. R., Hewitt, C. N., & Berners-Lee, M.
- Affiliations
- Lancaster University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Berners-Lee, M.
- Venue
- Food Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-05
- Volume
- 77
- Pages
- 50-58
- ISSN
- 0306-9192 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2800552183
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 11.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.lancs.ac.uk
- Licence
- Locations
- Food Policy (publishedVersion)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
- Keywords
- food waste disposal, greenhouse gas emissions, food retailers, carbon footprint, anaerobic digestion, composting, landfill, incineration, food donation, animal feed, embodied emissions, energy density, waste hierarchy, food waste reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
