Cited by 44Consumer Attitudes and Food LabelingEconomic and Environmental ValuationConsumer behavior in food and health

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 34 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Viewpoint: Are food labels good?

Sunstein, Cass R.·2021·Food Policy

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101984

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Complex ordinal cues are extremely rare in commercial marketing practice, plausibly because commercial practitioners agree with the academic research community regarding their effectiveness, especially in FMCG markets.

    “Complex ordinal cues are extremely rare in commercial marketing practice-quite plausibly because commercial practitioners agree with the academic research community regarding their effectiveness, especially in FMCG markets [29,30].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, & U.S. Department of Transportation, 2011, Revisions and additions to motor vehicle fuel economy label, Fed. Reg., 76, 39517

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sunstein, C. R.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Sunstein, Cass R.
Venue
Food Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
99
Pages
101984
ISSN
0306-9192 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3092189092
Cited by
44
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer behavior in food and health
Keywords
food labeling, willingness to pay, welfare effects, consumer information, behavioral biases, present bias, optimism bias, endogenous preferences, breakeven analysis, health outcomes, economic savings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review