Global shocks to fertilizer markets: Impacts on prices, demand and farm profitability
Open accessAbstract
• Supply chain disruptions caused major spikes in fertilizer prices during 2021–2022. • Globally, the price shocks only had a muted impact on fertilizer usage. • On average, profitability for commercial crop producers was affected only mildly. • Farmer profitability in low-income Africa was affected more severely, however. • Low usage makes African smallholders less vulnerable to fertilizer supply shocks. During 2021–2022, spiking fertilizer prices raised fears that fertilizer application would drop around the world, leading to lower crop production, higher food prices, and greater food insecurity. Even writing mid-2024, a paucity of data impedes a full assessment of how the underlying global market shocks may have affected farmers and food production around the world. Using proxy indicators for fertilizer demand and farm profitability, we find that despite the steep increase in input costs, global demand for fertilizer fell only modestly during the 2022–2023 crop cycle, suggesting many (commercial) farmers were able and willing to absorb increased input costs in the context of generally good harvest prospects and, at the time, high crop prices. However, we also find the fertilizer price spikes have not been felt equally, with many farmers in Africa estimated to have been affected more adversely, even though with varied impacts also amongst those farmers.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Ten striking facts about agricultural input use in Sub-Saharan Africa
Sheahan, M., & Barrett, C. B. (2017) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.09.010 · Cited by 594 · see citing works
The role of market concentration in the agrifood industry
Hernandez, M. A., Espinoza, A., Berrospi, M. L., Deconinck, K., Swinnen, J., & Vos, R. (2023) · doi:10.2499/p15738coll2.136567 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fertilizer, soil health, and economic shocks: A synthesis of recent evidence
Abay, K. A., Chamberlin, J., Chivenge, P., & Spielman, D. J. (2025) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102892 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Amankwah, A., Ambel, A., Gourlay, S., Kilic, T., Markhof, Y., & Wollburg, P. (2025) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102885 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Willwerth, H. S., Khaemba, C. N., Serra, T., Michelson, H. C., Rutsaert, P., & Donovan, J. (2025) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102889 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Behind the application of chemical fertilisers: What influences dairy farmers’ demand?
Aguiar-Noury, F., Buckley, C., & Hynes, S. (2026) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.129465 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
- Authors
- Vos, R., Glauber, J., Hebebrand, C., & Rice, B.
- Affiliations
- International Food Policy Research Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Vos, Rob
- ORCID
- Vos, Rob
- Venue
- Food Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-05
- Volume
- 133
- Pages
- 102790
- ISSN
- 0306-9192 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4405736589
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 68 · 2025: 23
- FWCI
- 32.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Food Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- European Commission
- USAID
- UK Government Foreign Commonwealth & Development Office
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Agricultural economics and policies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural risk and resilience
- Keywords
- fertilizer prices, fertilizer demand, supply chain disruption, farm profitability, smallholder farmers, Africa, input costs, food security, crop production, food prices
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review