Cited by 16Agricultural Science and FertilizationAgricultural economics and policiesAgricultural Economics and Practices

Maize yield responsiveness and profitability of fertilizer: New survey evidence from six African countries

Open access
Ragasa, Catherine, Takeshima, Hiroyuki, Asante, Seth, Amare, Mulubrhan, Ma, Ning, Olanrewaju, Opeyemi, Duchoslav, Jan·2025·Food Policy

Abstract

• Maize yield response to Nitrogen (N) was low in Ethiopia, Malawi, Nigeria, & Tanzania. • Maize yields in Ghana and Uganda showed higher responsiveness to N (15–20 kg). • N-to-maize price ratios were falling over time, spiked in 2022, and fell again in 2023. • Increasing N use would be profitable (MVCR > 2) in Ethiopia, Ghana, Nigeria, & Uganda. • But increasing N use would be unprofitable (MVCR < 1) in Malawi and Tanzania. Enhancing maize productivity growth is pivotal for revolutionizing the agrifood system in Africa, with inorganic fertilizer serving as a fundamental input for catalyzing this progress. However, concerns are mounting about the low and decreasing yield response and profitability of inorganic fertilizer use, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa. This study aims to refine yield response and profitability models by incorporating recent data from nationally representative and panel datasets spanning six countries. Most countries exhibited low nitrogen yield responsiveness (4–7 kg), while Ghana and Uganda showed higher responsiveness (15–20 kg) per additional 1 kg of nitrogen. Analysis of fertilizer-to-maize price ratios from 2010 to 2023 showed a downward trend, with spikes in 2022 in Ghana, Malawi, Nigeria, and Tanzania. Overall, except for those years, the data suggest a trend of increasingly favorable price incentives for fertilizer use. Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Uganda experienced declines in the fertilizer-to-maize price ratio. Increasing inorganic fertilizer use would be profitable in Ethiopia, Ghana, Nigeria, and Uganda at current market prices, but not in Malawi or Tanzania. Subsidies in Malawi and Tanzania have boosted profitability, but these may not be necessary in Ghana, Nigeria, or Uganda, which already have favorable price incentives; Malawi could benefit by substantially reducing its 80 percent subsidy while maintaining decent price incentives and farm profits. The paper proposes policy options based on factors influencing yield responsiveness and potential improvements drawn from new modeling and synthesis of the literature.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102815

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ragasa, C., Takeshima, H., Asante, S., Amare, M., Ma, N., Olanrewaju, O., & Duchoslav, J.
Affiliations
International Food Policy Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Ragasa, Catherine
Venue
Food Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-05
Volume
133
Pages
102815
ISSN
0306-9192 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407008228
Cited by
14
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6
FWCI
7.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • United States Agency for International Development
  • Vlaamse Overheid
  • Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Agricultural economics and policies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Economics and Practices
Keywords
nitrogen fertilization, fertilizer profitability, fertilizer policy, sub-Saharan Africa, maize productivity, farm profitability, nitrogen use efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review