Cited by 102Sensory Analysis and Statistical MethodsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies

Effect of sensory education on school children's food perception: A 2-year follow-up study

Mustonen, Sari, Rantanen, Reetta, Tuorila, Hely·2009·Food Quality and Preference

Abstract

We studied the effect of sensory education on taste and odor awareness and food ratings in school children. Second and fifth graders (n = 244, 7-11 years at the baseline) from two schools in Helsinki area participated in the study. At the completion of the study at two years, the groups consisted of 96 (education, school one) and 79 (control, school two) students. At baseline and in four follow-up measurements, both groups performed six tasks: (1) free odor naming (five odors), (2) taste identification (six solutions), (3) descriptive characterization of two breads, (4) ratings of the extent to which subjects paid attention to sensory properties of food, (5) willingness-to-try ratings of unfamiliar vs. familiar foods and (6) aided odor naming (five odors, 10 verbal labels). Subsequently, the education group received two waves of sensory education: the first wave comprised of 10 Classes du goût lessons and the 2nd of 5 lessons familiarizing the children with different food categories. The second wave was performed only for 2/3 of the education group. The educated children improved their skills in identifying tastes and odors, and characterizing foods, while no difference was seen in the performance of the control group. However, effects of education were mainly observed for the younger children only. Although the improvements were small and not always consistent over the study period, their general direction was encouraging: the sensory education activated children's odor and…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.10.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Safety perception is connected to product familiarity.

    “Laureati, Bergamaschi, and Pagliarini (2014) and Mustonen, Rantanen, and Tuorila (2009) built on existing evidence and showed that safety perception is also connected to product familiarity.”

    From Emerging trends in European food, diets and food industry (2018) · cites this paper as Mustonen et al., 2009

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 102

Authors
Mustonen, S., Rantanen, R., & Tuorila, H.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Mustonen, Sari
Venue
Food Quality and Preference
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
230-240
ISSN
0950-3293 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000518333
Cited by
102
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Food Quality and Preference (publishedVersion)
Funders
Valio
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Keywords
sensory education, food perception, taste identification, odor identification, elementary school students, food characterization, age differences, follow-up study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review