The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Temporal Dominance of Sensations: Construction of the TDS curves and comparison with time–intensity
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Armitage, 1998, Vol. 2
- Bonnans, 1995, Interaction of salivary flow with temporal perception of sweetness, sourness and fruitiness, Physiology and Behavior, 57, 569, 10.1016/0031-9384(94)00367-E · DOI
- Chaya, 2004, Use of the STATIS method to analyze time–intensity profiling data, Food Quality and Preference, 15, 3, 10.1016/S0950-3293(02)00219-7 · doi:10.1016/s0950-3293(02)00219-7
- Clark, 1994, Limiting response alternatives in time–intensity scaling: An examination of the halo-dumping effect, Chemical Senses, 19, 583, 10.1093/chemse/19.6.583 · DOI · Paper page
- Duizer, 1996, Dual-attribute time–intensity measurement of sweetness and peppermint perception of chewing-gum, Journal of Food Science, 61, 636, 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1996.tb13175.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1996.tb13175.x
- Duizer, 1993, Time–intensity methodology for beef tenderness perception, Journal of Food Science, 58, 943, 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1993.tb06084.x · DOI
- Ishikawa, 1995, Temporal perception of astringency and sweetness in red wine, Food Quality and Preference, 6, 27, 10.1016/0950-3293(94)P4209-O · DOI
- King, 1999, Changes in bitterness as beer ages naturally, Food Quality and Preference, 10, 315, 10.1016/S0950-3293(98)00040-8 · doi:10.1016/s0950-3293(98)00040-8
- Lee, 1986, Time–intensity: The temporal aspects of sensory perception, Food Technology, 40, 71
- Le Révérend, 2008, Comparison between temporal dominance of sensation and time intensity results, Food Quality and Preference, 19, 174, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.06.012 · DOI
- Pessina, R., Patron, C., Pineau, N., Piombino, P., Moio, L., & Schlich, P. (2004). Measuring temporality of sensations in wine. In A sense of identity conference.
- Pineau, N., Cordelle, S., & Schlich, P. (2003a). Temporal Dominance of Sensations: A new technique to record several sensory attributes simultaneously over time. In 5th Pangborn symposium (p. 121). July 20–24.
- Pineau, 2003, Dominance temporelle des sensations – Codage et analyse d’un nouveau type de données sensorielles, XXXVème Journée de Statistiques, 2–6, 777
- Pineau, N., Pessina, R., Cordelle, S., Imbert, A., Rogeaux, M., & Schlich, P. (2004). Temporal Dominance of Sensations: Comparison with conventional profiling and time intensity. In 7th Sensometrics conference (p. 40). July 28–30.
- Pionnier, 2004, Flavor perception of a model cheese: Relationships with oral and physico-chemical parameters, Food Quality and Preference, 15, 843, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.04.011 · DOI
- Wendin, 2003, Modelling and analysis of dynamic sensory data, Food Quality and Preference, 14, 663, 10.1016/S0950-3293(02)00208-2 · doi:10.1016/s0950-3293(02)00208-2
- Zimoch, 1998, Effective discrimination of meat tenderness using dual attribute time intensity, Journal of Food Science, 63, 940, 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1998.tb15828.x · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1998.tb15828.x
Cited by
Rheology and tribology: Two distinctive regimes of food texture sensation
Chen, J., & Stokes, J. R. (2012) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2011.11.006 · Cited by 377
The interplay of customer experience and commitment
Keiningham, T., Ball, J., Benoit (née Moeller), S., Bruce, H. L., Buoye, A., Dzenkovska, J., Nasr, L., Ou, Y.-C., & Zaki, M. (2017) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-09-2016-0337 · Cited by 156
Sugar reduction in probiotic chocolate-flavored milk: Impact on dynamic sensory profile and liking
Oliveira, D., Antúnez, L., Giménez, A., Castura, J. C., Deliza, R., & Ares, G. (2015) · Food Research International · doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2015.05.050 · Cited by 139
How can aroma-related cross-modal interactions be analysed? A review of current methodologies
Poinot, P., Arvisenet, G., Ledauphin, J., Gaillard, J.-L., & Prost, C. (2013) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.10.007 · Cited by 81
Charles, M., Endrizzi, I., Aprea, E., Zambanini, J., Betta, E., & Gasperi, F. (2017) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.06.014 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Pineau, N., Schlich, P., Cordelle, S., Mathonnière, C., Issanchou, S., Imbert, A., Rogeaux, M., Etiévant, P., & Köster, E.
- Venue
- Food Quality and Preference
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 450-455
- ISSN
- 0950-3293 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007687987
- Cited by
- 719
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temporal Dominance of Sensations: Construction of the TDS curves and comparison with time–intensity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.04.005
- The paper
- Pineau, N., Schlich, P., Cordelle, S., Mathonnière, C., Issanchou, S., Imbert, A., Rogeaux, M., Etiévant, P., & Köster, E. (2009). Temporal Dominance of Sensations: Construction of the TDS curves and comparison with time–intensity. Food Quality and Preference. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.04.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
