Cited by 81Sensory Analysis and Statistical MethodsMultisensory perception and integrationFermentation and Sensory Analysis

How can aroma-related cross-modal interactions be analysed? A review of current methodologies

Open access
Poinot, Pauline, Arvisenet, Gaëlle, Ledauphin, Jérôme, Gaillard, Jean-Luc, Prost, Carole·2013·Food Quality and Preference

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms involved in the perception of food aroma is one of the major objectives of flavour studies. Yet, it remains difficult to explain this perception due to the diversity of cross–modal interactions that occur between aroma, taste and texture during food consumption. Various sensory and instrumental methods have been developed to describe such interactions and to highlight their origins. Each of them has its own advantages and drawbacks. This paper describes the methods used over the past decade in order to help researchers choose the right approach to study aroma–related interactions. Their objectives, weaknesses and strengths are reported and contrasted. Their ability to reveal interactions in model and real food matrices is also discussed. Finally, innovative original approaches are presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.10.007

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the majority of studies investigating odour-induced changes in taste perception including sweetness, odorants and tastants have been presented together intrinsically in liquid mixtures which have been sipped.

    “In the majority of studies investigating specific odour-induced changes in taste perception including that of sweetness, odorants and tastants have been presented together intrinsically in liquid mixtures which have been sipped (see References [107,108] for reviews).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Poinot, P., Arvisenet, G., Ledauphin, J., Gaillard, J.-L., & Prost, C.
Affiliations
  • Aliments Bioprocédés Toxicologie Environnements (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Poinot, Pauline
Venue
Food Quality and Preference
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
304-316
ISSN
0950-3293 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046121168
Cited by
81
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food Quality and Preference (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
Keywords
cross-modal interaction, food aroma, flavor perception, food matrix

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review