Cited by 55Biochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesSensory Analysis and Statistical MethodsOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies

Odour-modulation of taste ratings by chefs

Boakes, Robert A., Hemberger, Helga·2012·Food Quality and Preference

Abstract

Odour-modulation of taste perception refers to the finding that adding a tasteless odorant can change a taste’s attributes. An extensively studied example is sweetness enhancement, whereby adding an odorant such as caramel makes a sucrose solution taste sweeter. Experiment 1 tested whether chefs would display odour-modulation to the same extent as controls. When asked to rate sucrose and citric acid solutions that contained an odorant, caramel or citral, or no odorant, participants showed sweetness enhancement and sourness suppression by caramel. Citral produced sourness enhancement of sucrose – a new finding – but, paradoxically, when added to citric acid it decreased sourness ratings and increased sweetness ratings. The only difference detected between chefs and controls was in the way that citral affected sourness ratings of sucrose solutions. Experiment 2 tested participants without professional culinary experience on their food/drink associations to caramel and citral. The results showed that, while the associations evoked by caramel were almost always sweet foods or drinks, associations to citral varied widely in terms of sweetness and sourness. The latter suggests an explanation for the mixed pattern of results obtained for citral in Experiment 1.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.01.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 55

Authors
Boakes, R. A., & Hemberger, H.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB)
Corresponding author
Boakes, Robert A.
Venue
Food Quality and Preference
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
81-86
ISSN
0950-3293 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105894792
Cited by
55
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Food Quality and Preference (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Keywords
taste perception, chefs, sweetness enhancement, caramel, citral, sucrose, citric acid, aroma compounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review