The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Eating novel foods: An application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to predict the consumption of an insect-based product
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466601164939 · Cited by 9,970
Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, Third Edition
Byrne, B. M. (2016) · doi:10.4324/9781315757421 · Cited by 4,653
Predicting and Changing Behavior
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2011) · doi:10.4324/9780203838020 · Cited by 2,807
McEachan, R. R. C., Conner, M., Taylor, N. J., & Lawton, R. J. (2011) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2010.521684 · Cited by 2,279
Edible insects: future prospects for food and feed security
van Huis, A., Itterbeeck, J. V., Klunder, H. C., Mertens, E., Halloran, A., Muir, G., & Vantomme, P. (2013) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · Cited by 1,694
Hardeman, W., Johnston, M., Johnston, D., Bonetti, D., Wareham, N., & Kinmonth, A. L. (2002) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/08870440290013644a · Cited by 884
Edible insects: future prospects for food and feed security
Ball, J. (2014) · The International Forestry Review · Cited by 882
Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society
Verbeke, W. (2015) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.008 · Cited by 849
Edible Insects in a Food Safety and Nutritional Perspective: A Critical Review
Belluco, S., Losasso, C., Maggioletti, M., Alonzi, C. C., Paoletti, M. G., & Ricci, A. (2013) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12014 · Cited by 708
Cited by
The Potential Role of Insects as Feed: A Multi-Perspective Review.
Sogari, G., Amato, M., Biasato, I., Chiesa, S., & Gasco, L. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9040119 · Cited by 395
Self-citationCarfora, V., Cavallo, C., Catellani, P., Del Giudice, T., & Cicia, G. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu13061904 · Cited by 144
Moons, I., Barbarossa, C., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2018) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.05.012 · Cited by 75
Placentino, U., Sogari, G., Viscecchia, R., De Devitiis, B., & Monacis, L. (2021) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods10051117 · Cited by 53
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Menozzi, D., Sogari, G., Veneziani, M., Simoni, E., & Mora, C.
- Venue
- Food Quality and Preference
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-07
- Volume
- 59
- Pages
- 27-34
- ISSN
- 0950-3293 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2585954515
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 21.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Eating novel foods: An application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to predict the consumption of an insect-based product. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.02.001
- The paper
- Menozzi, D., Sogari, G., Veneziani, M., Simoni, E., & Mora, C. (2017). Eating novel foods: An application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to predict the consumption of an insect-based product. Food Quality and Preference. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.02.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
