Healthy food is nutritious, but organic food is healthy because it is pure: The negotiation of healthy food choices by Danish consumers of organic food
Open accessAbstract
There is increasing demand for organic food products throughout the Western world. Health concerns have frequently been found to be the main motivation of consumers purchasing organic products, but the literature on consumer preferences and behavior is less clear about what ‘health’ means to consumers of these products, and because of this it remains unclear what exactly drives consumers to choose organic products. This article investigates health from the perspective of consumers, and analyzes negotiations of, and justifications behind, their consumption preferences. The analysis is based on a focus group study conducted in Denmark in 2016. Three different understandings of health can be found when consumers explain their preferences for organic products: Health as purity; Health as pleasure, and a Holistic perspective on health. The first two are familiar from the literature on food. The third, which reflects principles behind organic agriculture, is less documented in the context of consumption. Health as purity was the dominant understanding of health used by the participants when explaining why they purchased organic food products. When participants discussed healthy eating in general, detached from a specific context, most employed a purely nutritional perspective as a definitive argument in supporting claims about healthy eating. The paper’s findings have implications for future research on organic consumption. They also have practical implications for organic food producers and manufacturers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The literature on consumer preferences does not investigate what "health" means to consumers.
“the literature on consumer preferences does not investigate what “health” means to these consumers [21].”
From Consumer Understanding of Food Quality, Healthiness, and Environmental Impact: A Cross-National Perspective (2019) · cites this paper as [21]
Concerns about food health are among the main motivators of consumers to purchase different types of products.
“concerns about food health are among the main motivators of consumers to purchase different types of products”
From Consumer Understanding of Food Quality, Healthiness, and Environmental Impact: A Cross-National Perspective (2019) · cites this paper as [21]
Cites
Magnusson, M. K., Arvola, A., Hursti, U.-K. K., Åberg, L., & Sjödén, P.-O. (2003) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/s0195-6663(03)00002-3 · Cited by 941 · see citing works
Commensality, society and culture
Fischler, C. (2011) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/0539018411413963 · Cited by 585 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The logic is that it is healthy to have a ‘happy’ body, to experience pleasure, and to enjoy food as a part of a social community; and that good quality foods satiate better than food of low quality and thus make one eat less, but better (Fischler, 2011; Vogel and Mol, 2014).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Petrescu, D. C., Vermeir, I., & Petrescu-Mag, R. M. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17010169 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ditlevsen, K., Sandøe, P., & Lassen, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Ditlevsen, Kia
- Venue
- Food Quality and Preference
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 71
- Pages
- 46-53
- ISSN
- 0950-3293 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2811113373
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 17.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Food Quality and Preference (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture) (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Copenhagen
- ICROFS
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer behavior in food and health
- Keywords
- organic food, healthy eating, holistic health, organic food consumption, consumer motivation, food choice, organic farming, Danish consumers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review