Cited by 270Organic Food and AgricultureConsumer Attitudes and Food LabelingConsumer behavior in food and health

Healthy food is nutritious, but organic food is healthy because it is pure: The negotiation of healthy food choices by Danish consumers of organic food

Open access
Ditlevsen, Kia, Sandøe, Peter, Lassen, Jesper·2019·Food Quality and Preference

Abstract

There is increasing demand for organic food products throughout the Western world. Health concerns have frequently been found to be the main motivation of consumers purchasing organic products, but the literature on consumer preferences and behavior is less clear about what ‘health’ means to consumers of these products, and because of this it remains unclear what exactly drives consumers to choose organic products. This article investigates health from the perspective of consumers, and analyzes negotiations of, and justifications behind, their consumption preferences. The analysis is based on a focus group study conducted in Denmark in 2016. Three different understandings of health can be found when consumers explain their preferences for organic products: Health as purity; Health as pleasure, and a Holistic perspective on health. The first two are familiar from the literature on food. The third, which reflects principles behind organic agriculture, is less documented in the context of consumption. Health as purity was the dominant understanding of health used by the participants when explaining why they purchased organic food products. When participants discussed healthy eating in general, detached from a specific context, most employed a purely nutritional perspective as a definitive argument in supporting claims about healthy eating. The paper’s findings have implications for future research on organic consumption. They also have practical implications for organic food producers and manufacturers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.06.001

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ditlevsen, K., Sandøe, P., & Lassen, J.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Ditlevsen, Kia
Venue
Food Quality and Preference
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
71
Pages
46-53
ISSN
0950-3293 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2811113373
Cited by
270
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 1
FWCI
17.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food Quality and Preference (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Organic Eprints (International Centre for Research in Organic Food Systems, and Research Institute of Organic Agriculture) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Copenhagen
  • ICROFS
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer behavior in food and health
Keywords
organic food, healthy eating, holistic health, organic food consumption, consumer motivation, food choice, organic farming, Danish consumers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review