Cited by 941Organic Food and AgricultureConsumer Attitudes and Food LabelingConsumer behavior in food and health

Choice of organic foods is related to perceived consequences for human health and to environmentally friendly behaviour

Magnusson, Maria K, Arvola, Anne, Hursti, Ulla-Kaisa Koivisto, Åberg, Lars, Sjödén, Per-Olow·2003·Appetite

Abstract

We designed a questionnaire concerned with attitudes and behaviour towards organic foods, environmentally friendly behaviour (EFB), and perceived consequences of organic food choice in terms of human health, the environment and animal welfare. It was mailed in 1998 to a random nation-wide sample of 2000 Swedish citizens, ages 18-65 years, and 1154 (58%) responded. Self-reported purchase of organic foods was most strongly related to perceived benefit for human health. Performance of EFBs such as refraining from car driving was also a good predictor of purchase frequency. The results indicate that egoistic motives are better predictors of the purchase of organic foods than are altruistic motives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0195-6663(03)00002-3

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Health consciousness can be regarded as a more egoistic motive, social consciousness as a mixture of egoistic/altruistic motives, while consideration for the environment is more altruistic.

    “Health, environmental, and social consciousness differ in the sense that health consciousness can be regarded as a more egoistic motive (benefits the individual), social consciousness as a mixture of egoistic/altruistic motives (benefits her/his family) while consideration for the environment is more altruistic (benefits the environment rather than the individual) (Magnusson et al., 2003).”
  • For socially conscious consumers, organic marketplace behaviors offer a viable and meaningful way to connect their private concerns with concerns for their social surroundings.

    “For socially conscious consumers, organic marketplace behaviors offer a viable and meaningful way to connect their private concerns (e.g., concern for one's own health) with concerns for their social surroundings (e.g., concerns for the health of one's family) (Atkinson, 2012;Magnusson et al., 2003;De Maya et al., 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Magnusson, M. K., Arvola, A., Hursti, U.-K. K., Åberg, L., & Sjödén, P.-O.
Affiliations
Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
Magnusson, Maria K
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-02
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
109-117
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123457009
Cited by
941
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 60
FWCI
10.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Stiftelsen för Miljöstrategisk Forskning
  • Swedish Cancer Foundation
  • Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer behavior in food and health
Keywords
organic food consumption, environmentally friendly behaviour, perceived health benefits, animal welfare, egoistic motives, altruistic motivation, purchase frequency
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Attitude, Conservation of Natural Resources, Data Collection, Decision Making, Environment, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Public Health, Health Behavior, Food, Organic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review