Short-term effects of reduced-impact logging on eastern Amazon fauna
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A study of the short-term effects of RIL on fauna in eastern Pará found overall effects on populations to be minor, with no changes in richness, abundance, or composition of mammals.
“A study of the short-term effects of RIL on fauna in eastern Pará found overall effects on populations to be minor, with no changes in richness, abundance, or composition of mammals (Azevedo-Ramos et al. 2006).”
From Company–Community Logging Contracts in Amazonian Settlements: Impacts on Livelihoods and NTFP Harvests (2009) · cites this paper as Azevedo-Ramos et al. 2006
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Menton, M. C. S., Merry, F. D., Lawrence, A., & Brown, N. (2009) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-02831-140139 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
- Authors
- Azevedo-Ramos, C., de Carvalho, O., & do Amaral, B. D.
- Venue
- Forest Ecology and Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 232
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 26-35
- ISSN
- 0378-1127 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1996508643
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 5.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Forest Ecology and Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Keywords
- reduced impact logging, Amazonian fauna, species richness, arthropods, ants, Arachnida, birds, mammals, recolonization, forest disturbance, logging intensity, Pará
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review