Cited by 425Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsForest ecology and managementForest, Soil, and Plant Ecology in China

Do tree species influence soil carbon stocks in temperate and boreal forests?

Vesterdal, Lars, Clarke, Nicholas, Sigurdsson, Bjarni D., Gundersen, Per·2013·Forest Ecology and Management

Abstract

Information on tree species effects on soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks is scattered and there have been few attempts to synthesize results for forest floor and mineral soil C pools. We reviewed and synthesized current knowledge of tree species effects on SOC stocks in temperate and boreal forests based on common garden, retrospective paired stand and retrospective single-tree studies. There was evidence of consistent tree species effects on SOC stocks. Effects were clearest for forest floor C stocks (23 of 24 studies) with consistent differences for tree genera common to European and North American temperate and boreal forests. Support for generalization of tree species effects on mineral soil C stocks was more limited, but significant effects were found in 13 of 22 studies that measured mineral soil C.Proportional differences in forest floor and mineral soil C stocks among tree species suggested that C stocks can be increased by 200–500% in forest floors and by 40–50% in top mineral soil by tree species change. However, these proportional differences within forest floors and mineral soils are not always additive: the C distribution between forest floor and mineral soil rather than total C stock tends to differ among tree species within temperate forests. This suggests that some species may be better engineers for sequestration of C in stable form in the mineral soil, but it is unclear whether the key mechanism is root litter input or macrofauna activity. Tree species effects on SOC in targeted experiments were most consistent with results from large-scale inventories for forest floor C stocks whereas mineral soil C stocks appeared to be stronger influenced by soil type or climate than by tree species at regional or national scales. Although little studied, there are indications that higher tree species diversity could lead to higher SOC stocks but the role of tree species diversity per se vs. species identity effects needs to be disentangled in rigorous experimental designs.For targeted use of tree species to sequester soil C we must identify the processes related to C input and output, particularly belowground, that control SOC stock differences. We should also study forms and stability of C along with bulk C stocks to assess whether certain broadleaves store C in more stable form. Joint cooperation is needed to support syntheses and process-oriented work on tree species and SOC, e.g. through an international network of common garden experiments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.01.017

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The potential of soil C sequestration of woody bioenergy crops due to leaf-litter accumulation on the soil surface has been highlighted by several authors, but few works have provided a direct comparison between herbaceous and woody crops in terms of SOC stock variations.

    “The potential of soil C sequestration of woody bioenergy crops due to leaf-litter accumulation on the surface of the soil has been highlighted by several authors (Rytter 2012;Vesterdal et al., 2013;Hangs et al., 2014), but few works have provided a direct comparison between herbaceous and woody crops in terms of SOC stock variations.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vesterdal, L., Clarke, N., Sigurdsson, B. D., & Gundersen, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Agricultural University of Iceland (IS)
Corresponding author
Vesterdal, Lars
Venue
Forest Ecology and Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
309
Pages
4-18
ISSN
0378-1127 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986824250
Cited by
425
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 7
FWCI
36.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Forest Ecology and Management (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Villum Fonden
  • NordForsk
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
  • Social Sciences › Education › Forest, Soil, and Plant Ecology in China
Keywords
tree species effects, soil organic carbon stocks, forest floor carbon, mineral soil carbon, temperate forests, boreal forest, carbon sequestration, soil macrofauna, tree species diversity, common garden experiment, soil carbon stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review