Cited by 370Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil erosion and sediment transportForest, Soil, and Plant Ecology in China

Greater Soil Carbon Sequestration under Nitrogen-fixing Trees Compared with Eucalyptus Species

Resh, Sigrid C., Binkley, Dan, Parrotta, John A.·2002·Ecosystems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10021-001-0067-3

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Resh, S. C., Binkley, D., & Parrotta, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Colorado State University (US)
  • US Forest Service (US)
Venue
Ecosystems
Published
2002-04
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
217-231
ISSN
1432-9840 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153770511
Cited by
369
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 22
FWCI
18.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ecosystems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Social Sciences › Education › Forest, Soil, and Plant Ecology in China
Keywords
soil carbon sequestration, nitrogen-fixing trees, Eucalyptus, soil organic carbon, stable carbon isotopes, soil nitrogen, tropical plantations, volcanic ash soil, Vertisols, Entisol, afforestation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review