Cited by 103Fire effects on ecosystemsForest Management and PolicyForest ecology and management

The impact of increasing fire frequency on forest transformations in southern Siberia

Kukavskaya, Elena A., Buryak, Ludmila V., Shvetsov, Evgeny G., Conard, Susan G., Kalenskaya, Olga P.·2016·Forest Ecology and Management

Abstract

Wildfires are one of the main disturbances that impact structure, sustainability, and carbon budget of Siberian forests, as well as infrastructure and human safety. The Zabaikal region in the south of Siberia is characterized by one of the highest levels of fire activity in Russia. We have estimated fire disturbances in the Zabaikal region using both a satellite fire dataset and official fire statistics. Both datasets show a trend of increasing fire activity in the region. According to the satellite fire dataset, from 1996 to 2015 total annual area burned in the Zabaikal region varied from 0.12 to 6.33Mha with forest area burned accounting for 0.04–5.60Mha. The highest fire activity was observed in the central and southern parts of the Zabaikal region. About 13% (3.88Mha) of the total forest area in the Zabaikal region was burned more than once during the 20-yr period of observation, with many sites burned multiple times. Fire disturbance was highest in forests dominated by Scots pine. We have evaluated fire impact on fuel loads, carbon emissions, and tree regeneration on about 150 sites in the light-coniferous (larch or Scots pine dominated) forests of the region. Carbon emissions from fires on repeatedly burned areas were 3–50% of those from previously undisturbed sites. Regeneration density depended on site conditions and fire characteristics. Inadequate regeneration for forest recovery was observed in Scots pine stands on dry nutrient-poor soils as well as on repeatedly-d…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.10.015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Changes in fire regimes can contribute to a shift in vegetation composition, as more frequent fires, especially those coinciding with drought or insect outbreaks, suppress seedling regeneration and push closed forests toward more open forest-steppe systems.

    “Changes in fire regimes can also contribute to a shift in vegetation composition, as more frequent fires, especially those coinciding with drought or insect outbreaks, suppress seedling regeneration and push, for example, closed forests toward more open forest-steppe systems (77,78).”

    From Restoring Degraded Lands (2021) · cites this paper as [78]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kukavskaya, E. A., Buryak, L. V., Shvetsov, E. G., Conard, S. G., & Kalenskaya, O. P.
Affiliations
  • Siberian State Technological University (RU)
  • Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
  • US Forest Service (US)
Venue
Forest Ecology and Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
382
Pages
225-235
ISSN
0378-1127 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2530472478
Cited by
103
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Forest Ecology and Management (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Russian Foundation for Basic Research (15-04-06567)
  • President of the Russian Federation (MK-4646.2015.5)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
Keywords
wildfire frequency, fire disturbance, forest transformation, Scots pine forest, larch forest, repeated burning, tree regeneration, fuel load, fire prevention, firebreaks, fire statistics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review