Cited by 95Fire effects on ecosystemsForest Insect Ecology and ManagementPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics

Characterizing interactions between fire and other disturbances and their impacts on tree mortality in western U.S. Forests

Kane, Jeffrey M., Varner, J. Morgan, Metz, Margaret R., van Mantgem, Phillip J.·2017·Forest Ecology and Management

Abstract

Increasing evidence that pervasive warming trends are altering disturbance regimes and their interactions with fire has generated substantial interest and debate over the implications of these changes. Previous work has primarily focused on conditions that promote non-additive interactions of linked and compounded disturbances, but the spectrum of potential interaction patterns has not been fully considered. Here we develop and define terminology, expand on the existing conceptual framework and review the patterns and mechanisms of disturbance interactions with a focus on interactions between fire and other forest disturbances and a specific emphasis on resulting tree mortality. The types of interactions reflect the positive, negative, or neutral responses to the incidence, intensity, and effects of the interaction. These types of interactions are not always mutually exclusive, but can be distinct. The collective effect of the interactions will determine the longer-term ecosystem response that can result in a resistant, resilient, or compounded interaction. Our review indicates that the interactions of drought, bark beetles, or pathogens with fire often result in neutral or maintained interactions that do not negatively or positively influence the incidence or intensity following fire. The effect of these disturbance interactions on tree mortality ranged from antagonistic (reduced mortality compared to individual disturbances) to synergistic (greater mortality compared to individual disturbances) within and among disturbance interaction types but often resulted in additive effects (mortality is consistent with the summation of the two disturbances). Synergistic effects on tree mortality have been observed when the severity of the initial disturbance is moderate to high and time between disturbances is relatively short. When the sequence of disturbance interaction is reversed (e.g., fire precedes other disturbances) the conditions can generally promote impeded interactions (lower incidence of interaction), reduced interactions (lower intensity of interaction), and antagonistic interactions (lower tree mortality). While recent research on fire-disturbance interactions has increased over the last decade and provided important insights, more research that identifies the specific thresholds of incidence, intensity, and effects of interaction by region and forest type are needed to better assist management solutions that promote desired outcomes in rapidly changing ecosystems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.037

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Changes in fire regimes resulting from altered plant assemblages have the potential to generate abrupt fire regime shifts and to move ecological systems outside their historical evolutionary arena.

    “Ultimately, changes in fire regimes resulting from altered plant assemblages have the potential to generate abrupt fire regime shifts and to move ecological systems outside their historical evolutionary arena (Fill et al., 2015;Kane, Varner, Metz, & Mantgem, 2017).”

    From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Kane, Varner, Metz, & Mantgem, 2017

  • The forefront of fire effects model development is to include interactions with other disturbances, with human behaviour, and more refined representation of fire behaviour and effects, including feedbacks among fire, vegetation and climate.

    “The forefront of fire effects model development is to include interactions with other disturbances (drought, harvesting, insect outbreaks, wind-throw; Kane et al., 2017;Scheller et al., 2018), with human behaviour (suppression, human ignitions), and more refined representation of fire behaviour and effects, including the feedbacks among fire, vegetation and climate described in Section 3.”

    From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Kane et al., 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kane, J. M., Varner, J. M., Metz, M. R., & van Mantgem, P. J.
Affiliations
  • Cal Poly Humboldt (US)
  • US Forest Service (US)
  • Lewis & Clark College (US)
Corresponding author
Kane, Jeffrey M.
Venue
Forest Ecology and Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
405
Pages
188-199
ISSN
0378-1127 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2755532011
Cited by
95
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6
FWCI
5.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Forest Ecology and Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Forest Insect Ecology and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Keywords
tree mortality, drought, bark beetles, forest pathogens, synergistic interaction, antagonism, additive interaction, disturbance regimes, global warming, forest resilience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review