Assessment of a 15-year white-tailed deer management program and woody recovery in a suburban forest preserve
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The authors likely need at least another decade of monitoring in parks currently managing deer before successful recruitment can be observed across much of the study area.
“However, we likely need at least another decade of monitoring in the parks currently managing deer before successful recruitment of this nature can be observed across much of the study area (Nagy et al., 2022;Tanentzap et al., 2011).”
From Overabundant deer and invasive plants drive widespread regeneration debt in eastern United States national parks (2023) · cites this paper as Nagy et al., 2022
The lag in regeneration response in parks managing deer for over a decade may be partly due to deer density targets being too high and/or because sufficient regeneration response requires over 15 years of continual management.
“This may be partially due to target deer densities that are too high (e.g., VAFO's initial density target was 11.5-13.5 deer per square kilometer) and/or to the fact that it takes over 15 years of continual management to achieve a sufficient regeneration response (Nagy et al., 2022).”
From Overabundant deer and invasive plants drive widespread regeneration debt in eastern United States national parks (2023) · cites this paper as Nagy et al., 2022
Cites
Russell, M. B., Woodall, C. W., Potter, K. M., Walters, B. F., Domke, G. M., & Oswalt, C. M. (2017) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2016.10.038 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Impacts of white-tailed deer on regional patterns of forest tree recruitment
Bradshaw, L., & Waller, D. M. (2016) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2016.05.019 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
The legacy of deer overabundance: long-term delays in herbaceous understory recovery
Pendergast, T. H., Hanlon, S. M., Long, Z. M., Royo, A. A., & Carson, W. P. (2016) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/cjfr-2015-0280 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Schmit, J. P., Matthews, E. R., & Brolis, A. (2020) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118015 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Miller, K. M., Perles, S. J., Schmit, J. P., Matthews, E. R., Weed, A. S., Comiskey, J. A., Marshall, M. R., Nelson, P., & Fisichelli, N. A. (2023) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.2837 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nagy, C., Ng, C., Veverka, N., & Weckel, M.
- Affiliations
- American Museum of Natural History (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nagy, Christopher
- ORCID
- Nagy, Christopher
- Venue
- Forest Ecology and Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-01
- Volume
- 503
- Pages
- 119748
- ISSN
- 0378-1127 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3206649193
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 0.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Forest Ecology and Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Keywords
- white-tailed deer, deer management, overbrowsing, understory vegetation, stem density, species richness, introduced species, hemlock forest, mixed hardwood forest, deer density
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review