Cited by 712Forensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisAnalytical chemistry methods developmentPharmacological Effects and Assays

Society of hair testing guidelines for drug testing in hair

Cooper, Gail A.A., Kronstrand, Robert, Kintz, Pascal·2012·Forensic Science International

Abstract

The Society of Hair Testing (SoHT) Guidelines for Drug Testing in Hair provide laboratories with recommended best practice guidelines whether they are currently offering drug testing in hair, or plan to offer a hair testing service in the future. The guidelines include reference to recommended sample collection and storage procedures, through sample preparation, pre-treatment and analysis and the use of cut-offs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.10.024

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hair samples were collected following guidelines from the Society of Hair Testing.

    “Hair samples were collected 1-2 months prior to internship start (pre-internship) and at the four-, eight- and twelve-month time points during internship year, following guidelines from the Society of Hair Testing (Cooper et al., 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cooper, G. A. A., Kronstrand, R., & Kintz, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • Linköping University (SE)
Venue
Forensic Science International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-05
Volume
218
Issue
1-3
Pages
20-24
ISSN
0379-0738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2161340031
Cited by
712
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 3
FWCI
31.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Forensic Science International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Pharmacological Effects and Assays
Keywords
hair drug testing, forensic hair analysis, sample collection, sample storage, sample preparation, pretreatment, cut-off concentration
MeSH terms
Chromatography, Gas, Chromatography, Liquid, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Hair, Humans, Narcotics, Quality Control, Specimen Handling, Substance Abuse Detection, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review