The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification using face regions: Application and assessment in forensic scenarios
Abstract
This paper reports an exhaustive analysis of the discriminative power of the different regions of the human face on various forensic scenarios. In practice, when forensic examiners compare two face images, they focus their attention not only on the overall similarity of the two faces. They carry out an exhaustive morphological comparison region by region (e.g., nose, mouth, eyebrows, etc.). In this scenario it is very important to know based on scientific methods to what extent each facial region can help in identifying a person. This knowledge obtained using quantitative and statical methods on given populations can then be used by the examiner to support or tune his observations. In order to generate such scientific knowledge useful for the expert, several methodologies are compared, such as manual and automatic facial landmarks extraction, different facial regions extractors, and various distances between the subject and the acquisition camera. Also, three scenarios of interest for forensics are considered comparing mugshot and Closed-Circuit TeleVision (CCTV) face images using MORPH and SCface databases. One of the findings is that depending of the acquisition distances, the discriminative power of the facial regions change, having in some cases better performance than the full face.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
According to Tome et al. [63], the regions with the greatest discrimination power in facial recognition are the nose and forehead.
“According to Tome et al. [63], the regions with the greatest discrimination power in facial recognition are the nose and forehead.”
From Simulation of facial growth based on longitudinal data: Age progression and age regression between 7 and 17 years of age using 3D surface data (2019) · cites this paper as [63]
Citations
Cites
Generalized procrustes analysis
Gower, J. C. (1975) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291478 · Cited by 3,267
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Jain, 2011, Face recognition: Some challenges in forensics., in: FG, IEEE, 726
- Zhang, 2009, Face recognition across pose: a review., Pattern Recogn., 2876, 10.1016/j.patcog.2009.04.017 · DOI
- Tome, 2010, Acquisition scenario analysis for face recognition at a distance, in: 6th International Symposium on Visual Computing (ISVC)
- Jain, 2012, Face matching and retrieval in forensics applications, IEEE MultiMedia, 19, 20, 10.1109/MMUL.2012.4 · DOI · Paper page
- Bonnen, 2013, Component-based representation in automated face recognition, IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, 8, 239, 10.1109/TIFS.2012.2226580 · DOI
- Tistarelli, 1995, Active/space-variant object recognition, Image Vision Comput., 13, 215, 10.1016/0262-8856(95)90841-U · DOI
- Heisele, 2007, A component-based framework for face detection and identification, Int. J. Comput. Vision, 74, 167, 10.1007/s11263-006-0006-z · DOI
- Gupta, 2010, Anthropometric 3D face recognition, Int. J. Comput. Vision, 90, 331, 10.1007/s11263-010-0360-8 · DOI
- Sadr, 2003, The role of eyebrows in face recognition, Perception, 32, 285, 10.1068/p5027 · DOI
- Kim, 2005, Component-based lda face description for image retrieval and mpeg-7 standardisation, Image Vision Comput., 23, 631, 10.1016/j.imavis.2005.02.005 · DOI
- Gold, 2012, The perception of a face is no more than the sum of its parts, Psychol. Sci., 23, 427, 10.1177/0956797611427407 · DOI
- Shiang, 1999, A statistical approach to data analysis and 3-D geometric description of the human head and face, Proc. Natl. Sci. Coun. Repub. China B, 23, 19
- Jefferson, 2004, Facial beauty-establishing a universal standard, Int. J. Orthodont., 15, 9
- Gunes, 2006, Assessing facial beauty through proportion analysis by image processing and supervised learning, Int. J. Man–Machine Stud., 64, 1184
- Turk, 1991, Face recognition using eigenfaces, Proceedings CVPR ‘91, 586
- Grgic, 2011, Scface – surveillance cameras face database, Multimedia Tools Appl., 51, 863, 10.1007/s11042-009-0417-2 · DOI
- Ricanek, 2006, Morph: a longitudinal image database of normal adult age-progression, FGR 2006, 341
- Vera-Rodriguez, 2013, Analysis of the variability of facial landmarks in a forensic scenario, Lisboa, Portugal
- Faltemier, 2008, A region ensemble for 3-D face recognition, IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Security, 3, 62, 10.1109/TIFS.2007.916287 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Koudelová, J., Hoffmannová, E., Dupej, J., & Velemínská, J. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0212618 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Tome, P., Fierrez, J., Vera-Rodriguez, R., & Ramos, D.
- Venue
- Forensic Science International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 233
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 75-83
- ISSN
- 0379-0738
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
