CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 105

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Face Matching and Retrieval in Forensics Applications

Jain, Anil K., Klare, Brendan, Park, Unsang·2012·IEEE Multimedia
DOI 10.1109/mmul.2012.4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article surveys forensic face-recognition approaches and the challenges they face in improving matching and retrieval results as well as processing low-quality images.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mmul.2012.4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Automatic face recognition systems are not entirely automatic; human operators review candidate lists and check for the presence or absence of matching identities.

    “it is important to note that Automatic Face Recognition (FR) systems do not yet live up to their name—they are not entirely automatic.”

    From Error Rates in Users of Automatic Face Recognition Software (2015) · cites this paper as [3]

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. 10.1109/TPAMI.2010.180 · DOI
  2. 10.1109/TIFS.2010.2049842 · DOI
  3. 10.1109/TIFS.2011.2156787 · DOI
  4. 2011, Los Angeles Officials Identify Video Assault Suspects, New York Times
  5. klare, 2011, Heterogeneous Face Recognition using Kernel Prototype Similarities, MSU Technical Report MSU-CSE-11–2
  6. 10.1109/TIFS.2009.2038751 · DOI
  7. 10.1109/TPAMI.2008.222 · DOI
  8. tuthill, 2002, Individualization Principles and Procedures in Criminalistics
  9. 10.1109/BTAS.2010.5634533 · DOI
  10. charette, 2011, Here's Looking at You, and You, and You, IEEE Spectrum Blog
  11. grother, 2010, Report on the Evaluation of 2D Still-Image Face Recognition Algorithms, Nat'l Inst of Standards and Technology Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR) 7709
  12. 10.1109/TPAMI.2003.1227983 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/COGINF.2010.5599727 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/TPAMI.2010.14 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/978-3-540-74549-5_113 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/978-0-85729-932-1 · DOI
  17. vlahos, 2009, Surveillance Society: New High-Tech Cameras Are Watching You, Popular Mechanics
  18. 10.1109/TIFS.2011.2109951 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jain, A. K., Klare, B., & Park, U.
Venue
IEEE Multimedia
Publisher
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Published
2012-01
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
20-20
ISSN
1070-986X
DOI
10.1109/mmul.2012.4
Cited by
105
References
0
Licence
ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplorehelp/downloads/license-information/IEEE.html (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review