Post-mortem concentrations of drugs determined in femoral blood in single-drug fatalities compared with multi-drug poisoning deaths
Abstract
Background Reference concentrations of drugs in post-mortem femoral blood furnishes useful information when poisoning (intoxication) deaths are investigated. However, few publications compare the concentrations of drugs in single-drug fatalities with multi-drug intoxications. This article attempts to fill this gap in knowledge. Methods We searched a national forensic toxicology database (TOXBASE) and found N=13,963 deaths attributed by pathologists to intoxication by drugs (poisoning). The manner of death, whether accidental, suicidal or undetermined intent, was also available. To compare drug concentrations in living and deceased persons, we used information from people arrested for driving under the influence of drugs (DUID). Results The percentage of drug intoxication deaths classified as undetermined intent decreased and accidental overdose deaths increased during the study period. In 2010 manner of death was considered accidental, suicidal or undetermined, in 41%, 30% and 28% of victims, respectively. Most of the deceased had taken multiple drugs (mean three drugs/case) and four or more drugs were identified in 35% of deaths. In single-drug fatalities ethanol (1585), morphine (114), citalopram (28), propoxyphene (51), flunitrazepam (70), propiomazine (46), tramadol (20) and zopiclone (15) were most prevalent. Alprazolam and diazepam were common findings in multi-drug deaths, although these benzodiazepines were rarely encountered in mono-drug intoxication deaths. Median blood concentrations were appreciably higher (2-10 fold) in single-drug fatalities compared with multi-drug deaths. The blood concentrations in DUID suspects were mostly lower than in the multi-drug poisoning deaths. Conclusion This compilation of femoral blood concentrations of drugs in poisoning deaths provides a useful reference material, because we have distinguished between mono-drug intoxication deaths and poisoning with multiple-drugs.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Sweden, Jones et al. examined 13,963 poisoning-related autopsies, of which 4843 were suicides (34.68%).
“In the study by Jones et al. [27] covering 1993–2010, 13,963 poisoning-related autopsies were examined, of which 4843 were suicides (34.68%).”
From Toxicological Findings of Self-Poisoning Suicidal Deaths: A Systematic Review by Countries (2022) · cites this paper as [27]
In Sweden, ethanol was involved in 55% of cases, paracetamol in 21%, diazepam in 19%, morphine in a similar percentage, and minor antidepressants in a few cases.
“Toxicological analyses revealed that ethanol was involved in 55% of the cases, paracetamol in 21% of the cases, diazepam in 19% of the cases, morphine in a similar percentage of cases, and minor antidepressants in a few cases.”
From Toxicological Findings of Self-Poisoning Suicidal Deaths: A Systematic Review by Countries (2022) · cites this paper as [27]
The autopsy rate in deaths by suicide and poisoning is still low.
“The autopsy rate in deaths by suicide and poisoning is still low [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28].”
From Toxicological Findings of Self-Poisoning Suicidal Deaths: A Systematic Review by Countries (2022) · cites this paper as [27]
Cites
Suicide and suicidal behaviour
Turecki, G., & Brent, D. A. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00234-2 · Cited by 2,338 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toxicological Findings of Self-Poisoning Suicidal Deaths: A Systematic Review by Countries
Albano, G. D., Malta, G., La Spina, C., Rifiorito, A., Provenzano, V., Triolo, V., Vaiano, F., Bertol, E., Zerbo, S., & Argo, A. (2022) · Toxics · doi:10.3390/toxics10110654 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Mainoli, B., Gonçalves, N., Ferreira, J. J., & Mégarbane, B. (2022) · Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology · doi:10.1111/bcpt.13698 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jones, A. W., Holmgren, A., & Ahlner, J.
- Affiliations
- Linköping University (SE)
- Swedish National Board of Forensic Medicine (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Jones, Alan Wayne
- Venue
- Forensic Science International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-10
- Volume
- 267
- Pages
- 96-103
- ISSN
- 0379-0738 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2511892692
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4
- FWCI
- 2.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Forensic Science International (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Poisoning and overdose treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Historical and Scientific Studies
- Keywords
- femoral blood, drug poisoning deaths, manner of death, drug-impaired driving, reference concentration, benzodiazepines, ethanol, morphine, flunitrazepam, suicide
- MeSH terms
- Accidents, Ethanol, Central Nervous System Depressants, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Poisoning, Illicit Drugs, Suicide, Sweden, Databases, Factual, Substance-Related Disorders, Forensic Toxicology, Drug Overdose
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review