Cited by 6Forensic Entomology and Diptera StudiesForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesAutopsy Techniques and Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Autopsy as a form of evisceration: Implications for decomposition rate, pattern, and estimation of postmortem interval

Baigent, Christiane, Agan, Cortnee, Connor, Melissa, Hansen, Eriek S.·2020·Forensic Science International

Abstract

Evisceration following penetrating trauma or animal scavenging has the potential to affect the probative value of biological evidence and postmortem interval estimation. Autopsy presents an opportunity for controlled assessment of the rate of decomposition following evisceration. A balanced sample of twenty-six human cadavers was used to assess intergroup rate and trajectory of decomposition at the Forensic Investigation Research Station in Whitewater, Colorado. A linear mixed model using maximum likelihood estimates showed that the decomposition rate did not differ between autopsied and non-autopsied donors based on a comparison of slopes χ 2 (1) =0.223, p=0.637. The results demonstrate that penetrating trauma and the loss of systemic continuity following evisceration affect the pattern of decomposition, but not the rate. This suggests that the bloat phase may not be a major catalyst of decomposition, and that evisceration may not preclude the use of scopic methods for estimating postmortem interval, when sufficient peripheral tissue is retained.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.110068

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Mann, 1990, Time since death and decomposition of the human body: variables and observations in case and experimental field studies, J. Forensic Sci., 35, 103, 10.1520/JFS12806J · DOI · Paper page
  2. Hladík, 2000, A rare case of evisceration, Int. J. Legal Med., 113, 107, 10.1007/PL00007708 · DOI
  3. Gustafsson, 2015, Fatal Eurasian brown bear attacks—two Swedish fatalities in modern times, J. Forensic Sci., 60, 1658, 10.1111/1556-4029.12870 · DOI
  4. Byard, 1999, Pathologic features of farm and tractor-related fatalities in children, Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol., 20, 73, 10.1097/00000433-199903000-00018 · DOI
  5. Skowronek, 2017, Evisceration and intestine damage as a rare form of suicide in forensic and psychiatric practice – description of two cases, Arch. Med. Sadowej Kryminol., 67, 264
  6. Can, 2009, Landmine associated injuries in children in Turkey, J. Forensic Leg. Med., 16, 464, 10.1016/j.jflm.2009.07.017 · DOI
  7. Dennis, 2009, Abdominal wall injuries occurring after blunt trauma: incidence and grading system, Am. J. Surg., 197, 413, 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.11.015 · DOI
  8. Komarowska, 2018, Traumatic evisceration after blunt trauma in a 20-month-old boy, Ulus. Travma Acil. Cerrahi. Derg., 175
  9. Colard, 2015, Specific patterns of canine scavenging in indoor settings, J. Forensic Sci., 60, 495, 10.1111/1556-4029.12684 · DOI
  10. Haglund, 1989, Canid scavenging/disarticulation sequence of human remains in the Pacific northwest, J. Forensic Sci., 34, 587, 10.1520/JFS12679J · DOI
  11. Baigent, 2014, The effect of altitude on decomposition: a validation study of the Megyesi method, Proc. Am. Acad. Forensic Sci., 17
  12. Megyesi, 2005, Using accumulated degree-days to estimate PMI from decomposed human remains, J. Forensic Sci., 50, 1, 10.1520/JFS2004017 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Smith, 2014, The effects of sharp-force thoracic trauma on the rate and pattern on decomposition, J. Forensic Sci., 59, 319, 10.1111/1556-4029.12338 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Cross, 2010, The influence of penetrative trauma on the rate of decomposition, J. Forensic Sci., 55, 295, 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01277.x · DOI · Paper page
  15. Connor, 2018, Testing the use of pigs as human proxies in decomposition studies, J. Forensic Sci., 63, 1350, 10.1111/1556-4029.13727 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Sorg, 2013, Regional and micro-environmental taphonomic variation and decomposition in Northern New England, Proc. Am. Acad. Forensic Sci., 18
  17. Sorg, 2013, Developing frameworks for regional forensic taphonomy research and practice: a multi-regional symposium, Proc. Am. Acad. Forensic Sci., 18
  18. Bates, 2016, Comparison of decomposition rates between autopsied and non-autopsied human remains, Forensic Sci. Int., 261, 93, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.02.008 · DOI
  19. Galloway, 1989, Decay rates of human remains in an arid environment, J. Forensic Sci., 34, 607, 10.1520/JFS12680J · DOI
  20. Dabbs, 2016, Interobserver reliability of the total body score system for quantifying human decomposition, J. Forensic Sci., 61, 445, 10.1111/1556-4029.12962 · DOI
  21. Vass, 1992, Time since death determinations of human cadavers using soil solution, J. Forensic Sci., 37, 1236, 10.1520/JFS13311J · DOI
  22. Bates, 2015, Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4, J. Stat. Softw., 67, 1, 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Connor, 2019, Measuring desiccation using qualitative changes: a step toward determining regional decomposition sequences, J. Forensic Sci., 64, 1004, 10.1111/1556-4029.14003 · DOI
  24. Johnston, 2013, A test of the Megyesi equation on scavenged human remains, Proc. Am. Acad. Forensic Sci., 18

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Baigent, C., Agan, C., Connor, M., & Hansen, E. S.
Affiliations
Colorado Mesa University (US)
Corresponding author
Baigent, Christiane
Venue
Forensic Science International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
306
Pages
110068
ISSN
0379-0738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2990380691
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Forensic Science International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
Keywords
evisceration, autopsy, decomposition rate, decomposition patterns, postmortem interval estimation, human cadavers, penetrating trauma, biological evidence
MeSH terms
Forensic Entomology, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Animals, Autopsy, Cadaver, Colorado, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Larva, Male, Middle Aged, Postmortem Changes, Linear Models, Forensic Pathology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review