Cited by 97Forensic Entomology and Diptera StudiesAutopsy Techniques and OutcomesForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Influence of Penetrative Trauma on the Rate of Decomposition*†

Cross, Peter, Simmons, Tal·2010·Journal of Forensic Sciences

Abstract

Abstract: An understanding of the factors affecting decomposition is important for the accurate estimation of postmortem interval. An experimental study on the influence of penetrating trauma on decomposition rate was carried out using the domestic pig, Sus scrofa. The results of this study were: (i) Diptera were preferentially attracted to and oviposited at natural orifices. Trauma sites were not preferentially selected for oviposition; (ii) no differences between trauma and non‐trauma groups were found in time to skeletonization, weight loss (p = 0.906), total body score (p = 0.824), body temperature (p = 0.967), or changes in soil pH (p = 0.684); and (iii) the effect of investigator disturbance was significant when decomposition was measured as weight loss (p = 0.000). This study suggests that penetrating trauma of the type used in this study cannot be considered a major factor in the rate of decomposition and time to skeletonization of a gunshot trauma victim.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01277.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1520/JFS12806J · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1520/JFS2004017 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00411-X · DOI
  4. Gill‐King H, 1997, Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains, 93
  5. Micozzi MS, 1991, Postmortem change in human and animal remains: a systematic approach
  6. 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01206.x · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1520/JFS11524J · DOI
  8. Bass WM, 1997, Forensic taphonomy: the postmortem fate of human remains, 181
  9. 10.1520/JFS13492J · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1365-2915.1994.tb00093.x · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S0379-0738(02)00131-7 · DOI
  12. 10.1520/JFS13311J · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.11.018 · DOI
  14. Kelly JA, 2006, The influence of clothing, wrapping and physical trauma on carcass decomposition and arthropod succession
  15. 10.1146/annurev.en.37.010192.001345 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00510.x · DOI · Paper page
  17. Harde KW, 1998, A field guide in colour to beetles
  18. Etzinglioglu Z, 1996, Blowflies, naturalists handbook 23
  19. Anderson GS, 2002, Advances in forensic taphonomy: method, theory and archaeological perspectives, 173

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cross, P., & Simmons, T.
Affiliations
University of Lancashire (GB)
Corresponding author
Cross, Peter
Venue
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-03
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
295-301
ISSN
  • 0022-1198 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-4029
OpenAlex
W2067926606
Cited by
97
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Forensic Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CLOK (University of Central Lancashire) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
University of Central Lancashire
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Keywords
decomposition rate, penetrating trauma, gunshot wounds, postmortem interval estimation, weight loss, natural orifices, soil pH, domestic pigs
MeSH terms
Animals, Body Temperature, Diptera, Feeding Behavior, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Oviposition, Postmortem Changes, Rain, Soil, Temperature, Time Factors, Wounds, Gunshot, Weight Loss, Sus scrofa, Forensic Pathology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review