Cited by 14Forensic Entomology and Diptera StudiesForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesWildlife Ecology and Conservation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Animal scavenging on pig cadavers in the Lowveld of South Africa

Keyes, CA, Myburgh, J., Brits, D.·2021·Forensic Science International

Abstract

Scavenging animals often scatter skeletal remains of forensic interest and leave bite marks. This study aimed to identify scavenging animals in the rural Lowveld of South Africa and to describe their scattering pattern and bite marks on bone. Ten pig cadavers (Sus scrofa domesticus) (40-80 kg) were placed at the Wits Rural Facility, Limpopo, South Africa during the summer and winter seasons. Motion activated cameras recorded the scavenging. Scavenger species were identified and their behaviors, scattering pattern, and bite marks were described. Scavenging was primarily by vultures (hooded, white-backed, and lappet-faced). Marabou stork, slender and banded mongoose, genet, civet, warthog and honey badger also actively scavenged. Vultures began to scavenge the pig cadavers after 18hrs in summer and between 26 and 28 h in winter and skeletonized pig cadavers rapidly between 5 and 98 min. Skeletonization occurred more rapidly and diffusely in summer while winter cases were densely scattered. Overall the scattered remains were within an area of 157.9 m 2/1705.5 ft 2 with a radius of 7.09 m/23.3 ft. Vultures cleaned bones thoroughly with very minimal markings - primarily nonspecific scores. The described scattering pattern and bite marks will assist in the recovery and analysis of scavenged remains.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110969

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Seasons can greatly affect decomposition and vertebrate scavenging, e.g. due to differences in precipitation, temperature, or invertebrate colonisation rate.

    “Seasons can greatly affect decomposition and vertebrate scavenging, e.g. due to differences in precipitation, temperature, or invertebrate colonisation rate [40,53,56,72,84,88].”

    From Forensic experiments on animal scavenging: A systematic literature review on what we have and what we need (2023) · cites this paper as [56]

    The Results (p. 11) report that vultures began scavenging sooner in summer than in winter, and the Discussion (p. 15) says colder temperatures delay decomposition. The cited passages do not link the seasonal differences to precipitation or invertebrate colonisation; the Discussion instead suggests lower winter vulture activity as a possible explanation for the observed delay. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Young, 2014, Scavenging in Northwestern Europe: a survey of UK police specialist search officers, Polic.: J. Policy Pract., 8, 156, 10.1093/police/pau007 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Young, 2016, Applying knowledge of species‐typical scavenging behavior to the search and recovery of mammalian skeletal remains, J. Forensic Sci., 61, 458, 10.1111/1556-4029.12974 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Smith, 2017, Spatial complexity of carcass location influences vertebrate scavenger efficiency and species composition, Sci. Rep., 7, 1, 10.1038/s41598-017-10046-1 · DOI
  4. Steadman, 2018, Differential scavenging among pig, rabbit, and human subjects, J. Forensic Sci., 63, 1684, 10.1111/1556-4029.13786 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Rothschild, 1997, On the temporal onset of postmortem animal scavenging: “motivation” of the animal, Forensic Sci. Int., 89, 57, 10.1016/S0379-0738(97)00112-6 · DOI
  6. Pickering, 2004, Baboon taphonomy and its relevance to the investigation of large felid involvement in human forensic cases, Forensic Sci. Int., 144, 37, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.03.003 · DOI
  7. Young, 2014, An experimental study of vertebrate scavenging behavior in a Northwest European woodland context, J. Forensic Sci., 59, 1333, 10.1111/1556-4029.12468 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Morton, 2006, Taphonomy of child‐sized remains: a study of scattering and scavenging in Virginia, USA, J. Forensic Sci., 51, 475, 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00134.x · DOI · Paper page
  9. Spies, 2018, Forensic taphonomy: Scavenger-induced scattering patterns in the temperate southwestern Cape, South Africa—a first look, Forensic Sci. Int., 290, 29, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.06.015 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Spies, 2018, Forensic taphonomy: vertebrate scavenging in the temperate southwestern Cape, South Africa, Forensic Sci. Int., 290, 62, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.06.022 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Keyes, 2019, Taphonomic bone trauma caused by Southern African scavengers, Int. J. Leg. Med., 134, 1227, 10.1007/s00414-019-02154-6 · DOI
  12. Reeves, 2009, Taphonomic effects of vulture scavenging, J. Forensic Sci., 54, 523, 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01020.x · DOI
  13. Calce, 2007, Taphonomic changes to blunt force trauma: a preliminary study, J. Forensic Sci., 52, 519, 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00405.x · DOI
  14. Chute, 2017, A case of postmortem canine depredation, Am. J. Forensic Med. Pathol., 38, 100, 10.1097/PAF.0000000000000303 · DOI
  15. Toledo, 2017, A morphological and morphometric study of bite marks caused by mice (Mus musculus) on different baits for forensic purposes, J. Forensic Sci., 62, 462, 10.1111/1556-4029.13279 · DOI
  16. Matuszewski, 2019, Pigs vs people: the use of pigs as analogues for humans in forensic entomology and taphonomy research, Int. J. Leg. Med., 1
  17. Haynes, 1983, A guide for differentiating mammalian carnivore taxa responsible for gnaw damage to herbivore limb bones, Paleobiology, 9, 164, 10.1017/S0094837300007545 · DOI
  18. Andrés, 2012, A study of dimensional differences of tooth marks (pits and scores) on bones modified by small and large carnivores, Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci., 4, 209, 10.1007/s12520-012-0093-4 · DOI
  19. Kemp, 1975, Observations on the White-backed Vulture Gyps africanus in the Kruger National Park, with notes on other avian scavengers, Koedoe, 18, 51, 10.4102/koedoe.v18i1.914 · DOI
  20. Ogada, 2011, Large declines of the Hooded Vulture Necrosyrtes monachus across its African range, Ostrich, 82, 101, 10.2989/00306525.2011.603464 · DOI
  21. Anderson M. The Eskom Red Data Book of Birds of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Johannesburg: Birdlife South Africa; 1990. pp. 71–72.
  22. Spiegel, 2013, Factors influencing foraging search efficiency: why do scarce lappet-faced vultures outperform ubiquitous white-backed vultures?, Am. Nat., 181, E102, 10.1086/670009 · DOI
  23. Petrides, 1959, Competition for food between five species of East African vultures, Auk, 76, 104, 10.2307/4081860 · DOI
  24. Kruuk, 1967, Competition for food between vultures in East Africa, Ardea, 55, 3
  25. Pennycuick, 1971, Gliding flight of the white-backed vulture Gyps africanus, J. Exp. Biol., 55, 13, 10.1242/jeb.55.1.13 · DOI
  26. Spradley, 2012, Spatial patterning of vulture scavenged human remains, Forensic Sci. Int., 219, 57, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.11.030 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Grigg, 2017, Anatomical evidence for scent guided foraging in the turkey vulture, Sci. Rep., 7, 1, 10.1038/s41598-017-17794-0 · DOI
  28. Monsarrat, 2013, How predictability of feeding patches affects home range and foraging habitat selection in avian social scavengers?, PloS One, 8, 53077, 10.1371/journal.pone.0053077 · DOI
  29. Mundy PJ, Butchart D., Ledger J., Piper S., editors. On the vultures of Africa. Wings Over Africa—Proceedings of the International Seminar on Bird Migration: Research, Conservation, Education and Flight Safety; 2001.
  30. Houston, 1974, Food searching in griffon vultures, Afr. J. Ecol., 12, 63, 10.1111/j.1365-2028.1974.tb00107.x · DOI
  31. Kendall, 2012, Mechanisms of coexistence in vultures: understanding the patterns of vulture abundance at carcasses in Masai Mara National Reserve, Kenya, Condor, 114, 523, 10.1525/cond.2012.100196 · DOI
  32. Kendall, 2014, African vultures don't follow migratory herds: scavenger habitat use is not mediated by prey abundance, PLoS One, 9, 83470, 10.1371/journal.pone.0083470 · DOI
  33. Field, 1970, Observations on the food habits of tame warthog and antelope in Uganda, Afr. J. Ecol., 8, 1, 10.1111/j.1365-2028.1970.tb00825.x · DOI
  34. Cáceres, 2011, Was it the deer or the fox?, J. Archaeol. Sci., 38, 2767, 10.1016/j.jas.2011.06.020 · DOI
  35. Hutson, 2013, Osteophagia and bone modifications by giraffe and other large ungulates, J. Archaeol. Sci., 40, 4139, 10.1016/j.jas.2013.06.004 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Keyes, C., Myburgh, J., & Brits, D.
Affiliations
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
  • University of Pretoria (ZA)
Corresponding author
Keyes, CA
Venue
Forensic Science International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-10
Volume
327
Pages
110969
ISSN
0379-0738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3193462429
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Forensic Science International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Justice
  • American Academy of Forensic Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
pig carcasses, pigs, vultures, Hooded Vulture, white-backed vulture, lappet-faced vulture, marabou stork, mongoose, genets, civets, warthog, honey badger, skeletonization, scavenger behavior, seasonal variation, forensic taphonomy, Lowveld
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Wild, Bites and Stings, Bone and Bones, Cadaver, Feeding Behavior, Seasons, South Africa, Sus scrofa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review