Cited by 36Forensic Entomology and Diptera StudiesForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesDiptera species taxonomy and behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Forensic taphonomy: Vertebrate scavenging in the temperate southwestern Cape, South Africa

Spies, Maximilian J., Gibbon, Victoria E., Finaughty, Devin A.·2018·Forensic Science International

Abstract

Vertebrate scavenging can significantly accelerate the rate of decomposition, which can hinder estimating the post-mortem interval (PMI). Patterns of decomposition and scavenging are highly specific to different environments in a forensic context, with no known data for South Africa. A better understanding of local decomposition patterns, taking scavenging into account, could increase the accuracy of PMI estimation and improve identification of human remains. Using a porcine model in the forensically significant thicketed Cape Flats Dune Strandveld habitat, the effect of vertebrate scavenging on the decomposition process was examined. This part of Cape Town suffers from poor socioeconomic conditions and a high murder rate, which is due in part to the dense population. Human decomposition was simulated using three small (∼20kg) domestic pig (Sus scrofa domesticus) carcasses, with ethical clearance. One pig served as a control and was caged to prevent vertebrate but not invertebrate access; the other two served as experimental treatments. They were deployed in Delft, Cape Town, and observed by motion-activated, time-lapse remote photography to record scavenger species and activity. A rapid increase in the decomposition rate was observed due to Cape grey mongoose (Galerella pulverulenta) scavenging, with early skeletonisation reached by both experimental pigs by day 14, compared to the control remaining in advanced decomposition after 93 days. Mongoose is the primary scavenger i…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.06.022

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Ferreira, 2013, Can we infer post mortem interval on the basis of decomposition rate? A case from a Portuguese cemetery, Forensic Sci. Int., 226, 298, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.01.006 · DOI
  2. O’Brien, 2010, Forensically significant scavenging guilds in the southwest of Western Australia, Forensic Sci. Int., 198, 85, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.01.006 · DOI · Paper page
  3. O’Brien, 2017, Comparison of taphonomic progression due to the necrophagic activity of geographically disparate scavenging guilds, Can. Soc. Forensic Sci. J., 50, 42, 10.1080/00085030.2017.1260894 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Sutherland, 2013, The effect of body size on the rate of decomposition in a temperate region of South Africa, Forensic Sci. Int., 231, 257, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.05.035 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Megyesi, 2005, Using accumulated degree-days to estimate the postmortem interval from decomposed human remains, J. Forensic Sci., 50, 1, 10.1520/JFS2004017 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Moraitis, 2010, Forensic implications of carnivore scavenging on human remains recovered from outdoor locations in Greece, J. Forensic Leg. Med., 17, 298, 10.1016/j.jflm.2010.04.008 · DOI
  7. Cameron, 2012, Disarticulation sequences and scattering patterns in temperate southeastern Australia, Aust. J. Forensic Sci., 44, 197, 10.1080/00450618.2011.650206 · DOI · Paper page
  8. DeVault, 2003, Scavenging by vertebrates: behavioral, ecological, and evolutionary perspectives on an important energy transfer pathway in terrestrial ecosystems, Oikos, 102, 225, 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12378.x · DOI
  9. Haglund, 1989, Canid scavenging/disarticulation sequence of human remains in the Pacific Northwest, J. Forensic Sci., 34, 587, 10.1520/JFS12679J · DOI
  10. Myburgh, 2013, Estimating the postmortem interval (PMI) using accumulated degree-days (ADD) in a temperate region of South Africa, Forensic Sci. Int., 229, 165, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.03.037 · DOI
  11. Catts, 1992, Problem in estimating the postmortem interval in death investigations, J. Agric. Entomol., 9, 245
  12. Goff, 1993, Estimation of postmortem interval using arthropod development and successional patterns, Forensic Sci. Rev., 5, 81
  13. Schoenly, 2006, Recreating death’s acre in the school yard: using pig carcasses as model corpses to teach concepts of forensic entomology & ecological succession, Am. Biol. Teach., 68, 402, 10.1662/0002-7685(2006)68[402:RDAITS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  14. Reeves, 2009, Taphonomic effects of vulture scavenging, J. Forensic Sci., 54, 523, 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01020.x · DOI
  15. Matuszewski, 2014, Effect of body mass and clothing on decomposition of pig carcasses, Int. J. Legal Med., 128, 1039, 10.1007/s00414-014-0965-5 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Goff, 2009, Early post-mortem changes and stages of decomposition in exposed cadavers, Exp. Appl. Acarol., 49, 21, 10.1007/s10493-009-9284-9 · DOI
  17. Mann, 1990, Time since death and decomposition of the human body: variables and observations in case and experimental field studies, J. Forensic Sci., 35, 103, 10.1520/JFS12806J · DOI · Paper page
  18. Vass, 1992, Time since death determinations of human cadavers using soil solution, J. Forensic Sci., 37, 1236, 10.1520/JFS13311J · DOI
  19. Campobasso, 2001, Factors affecting decomposition and Diptera colonization, Forensic Sci. Int., 120, 18, 10.1016/S0379-0738(01)00411-X · DOI
  20. Cross, 2010, The influence of penetrative trauma on the rate of decomposition, J. Forensic Sci., 55, 295, 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01277.x · DOI · Paper page
  21. Smith, 2014, The effects of sharp-force thoracic trauma on the rate and pattern of decomposition, J. Forensic Sci., 59, 319, 10.1111/1556-4029.12338 · DOI · Paper page
  22. King, 2016, Postmortem scavenging by the Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana): impact on taphonomic assemblages and progression, Forensic Sci. Int., 266, 576, 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.06.021 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Brown, 2006, Variation in the taphonomic effect of scavengers in semi-arid Australia linked to rainfall and the El Niño Southern Oscillation, Int. J. Osteoarchaeol., 16, 165, 10.1002/oa.833 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Pokines, 2017, Taphonomic analysis of Rodentia and Lagomorpha bone gnawing based upon incisor size, J. Forensic Sci., 62, 50, 10.1111/1556-4029.13254 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Spies, M. J., Gibbon, V. E., & Finaughty, D. A.
Affiliations
University of Cape Town (ZA)
Corresponding author
Spies, Maximilian J.
Venue
Forensic Science International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
290
Pages
62-69
ISSN
0379-0738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2809605796
Cited by
36
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Forensic Science International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • South African National Research Foundation
  • University of Cape Town
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Diptera species taxonomy and behavior
Keywords
human decomposition, postmortem interval estimation, skeletonization, skeletal identification, South Africa
MeSH terms
Animals, Feeding Behavior, Herpestidae, Postmortem Changes, Rain, South Africa, Sunlight, Swine, Temperature, Forensic Anthropology, Models, Animal, Forensic Pathology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review