Cited by 135Sustainable Finance and Green BondsFinancial Markets and Investment StrategiesCorporate Social Responsibility Reporting

ESG ETFs and the COVID-19 stock market crash of 2020: Did clean funds fare better?

Pavlova, Ivelina, de Boyrie, Maria E.·2022·Finance Research Letters

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.frl.2021.102051

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pavlova, I., & de Boyrie, M. E.
Affiliations
University of Houston - Clear Lake (US)
Venue
Finance Research Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
44
Pages
102051
ISSN
1544-6123 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3151868156
Cited by
135
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 2
FWCI
19.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Finance research letters (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Keywords
COVID-19 market crash, risk-adjusted returns, ESG ratings, Big Five personality traits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review