Cited by 17,283Financial Markets and Investment StrategiesCorporate Finance and GovernanceFinancial Analysis and Corporate Governance

On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance

Open access
Carhart, Mark M.·1997·The Journal of Finance

Abstract

Using a sample free of survivor bias, I demonstrate that common factors in stock returns and investment expenses almost completely explain persistence in equity mutual funds' mean and risk‐adjusted returns. Hendricks, Patel and Zeckhauser's (1993) “hot hands” result is mostly driven by the one‐year momentum effect of Jegadeesh and Titman (1993) , but individual funds do not earn higher returns from following the momentum strategy in stocks. The only significant persistence not explained is concentrated in strong underperformance by the worst‐return mutual funds. The results do not support the existence of skilled or informed mutual fund portfolio managers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x

Cites

29 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Asness, Clifford S., 1994, Variables that explain stock returns, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill.
  2. Carhart, Mark M., 1995a, Survivor bias and persistence in mutual fund performance, Unpub- lished Ph.D. dissertation, Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carhart, M. M.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Carhart, Mark M.
Venue
The Journal of Finance
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-03
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
57-82
ISSN
  • 0022-1082 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-6261
OpenAlex
W2136120210
Cited by
17,283
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 680 · 2025: 832 · 2024: 901 · 2023: 945 · 2022: 931 · 2021: 1004 · 2020: 1006 · 2019: 984 · 2018: 950 · 2017: 959 · 2016: 942 · 2015: 914 · 2014: 872 · 2013: 765 · 2012: 842
FWCI
131.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Finance (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Corporate Finance and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Analysis and Corporate Governance
Keywords
mutual fund performance, performance persistence, hot hand effect, momentum strategies, risk-adjusted returns, survivorship bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review