The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Heavy use of prophylactic antibiotics in aquaculture: a growing problem for human and animal health and for the environment
Abstract
Summary: The accelerated growth of finfish aquaculture has resulted in a series of developments detrimental to the environment and human health. The latter is illustrated by the widespread and unrestricted use of prophylactic antibiotics in this industry, especially in developing countries, to forestall bacterial infections resulting from sanitary shortcomings in fish rearing. The use of a wide variety of antibiotics in large amounts, including non‐biodegradable antibiotics useful in human medicine, ensures that they remain in the aquatic environment, exerting their selective pressure for long periods of time. This process has resulted in the emergence of antibiotic‐resistant bacteria in aquaculture environments, in the increase of antibiotic resistance in fish pathogens, in the transfer of these resistance determinants to bacteria of land animals and to human pathogens, and in alterations of the bacterial flora both in sediments and in the water column. The use of large amounts of antibiotics that have to be mixed with fish food also creates problems for industrial health and increases the opportunities for the presence of residual antibiotics in fish meat and fish products. Thus, it appears that global efforts are needed to promote more judicious use of prophylactic antibiotics in aquaculture as accumulating evidence indicates that unrestricted use is detrimental to fish, terrestrial animals, and human health and the environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacterial Persistence as a Phenotypic Switch
Balaban, N. Q., Merrin, J., Chait, R., Kowalik, L., & Leibler, S. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1099390 · Cited by 2,952
SOS response promotes horizontal dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes
Beaber, J. W., Hochhut, B., & Waldor, M. K. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02241 · Cited by 1,186
Cited by
Call of the wild: antibiotic resistance genes in natural environments
Allen, H. K., Donato, J., Wang, H. H., Cloud-Hansen, K. A., Davies, J., & Handelsman, J. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2312 · Cited by 2,361
Food Animals and Antimicrobials: Impacts on Human Health
Marshall, B. M., & Levy, S. B. (2011) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00002-11 · Cited by 2,241
Dissemination of Antimicrobial Resistance in Microbial Ecosystems through Horizontal Gene Transfer
von Wintersdorff, C. J. H., Penders, J., van Niekerk, J. M., Mills, N. D., Majumder, S., van Alphen, L. B., Savelkoul, P. H. M., & Wolffs, P. F. G. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00173 · Cited by 1,707
The threat of antimicrobial resistance in developing countries: causes and control strategies
Ayukekbong, J. A., Ntemgwa, M., & Atabe, A. N. (2017) · Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control · doi:10.1186/s13756-017-0208-x · Cited by 1,315
Environmental factors influencing the development and spread of antibiotic resistance
Bengtsson-Palme, J., Kristiansson, E., & Larsson, D. G. J. (2018) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fux053 · Cited by 1,167
Metadata
- Authors
- Cabello, F. C.
- Venue
- Environmental Microbiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-05-24
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1137-1144
- ISSN
- 1462-2912 (ISSN-L)
- 1462-2920
- OpenAlex
- W1967354388
- Cited by
- 2,329
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 32.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Heavy use of prophylactic antibiotics in aquaculture: a growing problem for human and animal health and for the environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01054.x
- The paper
- Cabello, F. C. (2006). Heavy use of prophylactic antibiotics in aquaculture: a growing problem for human and animal health and for the environment. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01054.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.