Next generation sequencing and its applications in forensic genetics
Abstract
It has been almost a decade since the first next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies emerged and quickly changed the way genetic research is conducted. Today, full genomes are mapped and published almost weekly and with ever increasing speed and decreasing costs. NGS methods and platforms have matured during the last 10 years, and the quality of the sequences has reached a level where NGS is used in clinical diagnostics of humans. Forensic genetic laboratories have also explored NGS technologies and especially in the last year, there has been a small explosion in the number of scientific articles and presentations at conferences with forensic aspects of NGS. These contributions have demonstrated that NGS offers new possibilities for forensic genetic case work. More information may be obtained from unique samples in a single experiment by analyzing combinations of markers (STRs, SNPs, insertion/deletions, mRNA) that cannot be analyzed simultaneously with the standard PCR-CE methods used today. The true variation in core forensic STR loci has been uncovered, and previously unknown STR alleles have been discovered. The detailed sequence information may aid mixture interpretation and will increase the statistical weight of the evidence. In this review, we will give an introduction to NGS and single-molecule sequencing, and we will discuss the possible applications of NGS in forensic genetics.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Although NGS has been implemented for human identification in forensic genetics, retroactive analysis of whole-genome sequencing and long-read sequencing, cell line authentication has been limited to STR-CE.
“Although NGS has been implemented for human identification in forensic genetics, retroactive analysis of whole-genome sequencing and long-read sequencing (Bornman et al., 2012; Børsting and Morling, 2015; Valle-Silva et al., 2022), cell line authentication has been limited to STR-CE.”
From Short tandem repeat profiling via next-generation sequencing for cell line authentication (2023) · cites this paper as Børsting and Morling, 2015
Cites
Sequencing technologies – the next generation
Metzker, M. L. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2626 · Cited by 7,066 · see citing works
Direct detection of DNA methylation during single-molecule, real-time sequencing
Flusberg, B. A., Webster, D. R., Lee, J. H., Travers, K. J., Olivares, E. C., Clark, T. A., Korlach, J., & Turner, S. W. (2010) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1459 · Cited by 1,460 · see citing works
Genotype and SNP calling from next-generation sequencing data
Nielsen, R., Paul, J. S., Albrechtsen, A., & Song, Y. S. (2011) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2986 · Cited by 1,396 · see citing works
Walsh, S., Chaitanya, L., Clarisse, L., Wirken, L., Draus-Barini, J., Kovatsi, L., Maeda, H., Ishikawa, T., Sijen, T., de Knijff, P., et al. (2014) · Forensic Science International: Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.12.006 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Forensic STR analysis using massive parallel sequencing
Van Neste, C., Van Nieuwerburgh, F., Van Hoofstat, D., & Deforce, D. (2012) · Forensic Science International Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2012.03.004 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Characterization of genetic sequence variation of 58 STR loci in four major population groups
Novroski, N. M. M., King, J. L., Churchill, J. D., Seah, L. H., & Budowle, B. (2016) · Forensic Science International Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.09.007 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Genomic Encryption of Digital Data Stored in Synthetic DNA
Grass, R. N., Heckel, R., Dessimoz, C., & Stark, W. J. (2020) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202001162 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Short tandem repeat profiling via next-generation sequencing for cell line authentication
Chen, Y.-H., Connelly, J. P., Florian, C., Cui, X., & Pruett-Miller, S. M. (2023) · Disease Models & Mechanisms · doi:10.1242/dmm.050150 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Although NGS has been implemented for human identification in forensic genetics, retroactive analysis of whole-genome sequencing and long-read sequencing (Bornman et al., 2012; Børsting and Morling, 2015; Valle-Silva et al., 2022), cell line authentication has been limited to STR-CE.”
- Authors
- Børsting, C., & Morling, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Venue
- Forensic Science International: Genetics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 18
- Pages
- 78-89
- ISSN
- 1872-4973 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1996373267
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 18
- FWCI
- 6.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Forensic Science International Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Keywords
- next-generation sequencing, forensic genetics, single-molecule sequencing, microsatellite markers, single nucleotide polymorphisms, InDel markers, mRNA sequencing, DNA mixture interpretation, forensic DNA analysis
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Microsatellite Repeats, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Forensic Genetics, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review