Cited by 3Legal processes and jurisprudenceScientific Measurement and Uncertainty EvaluationForensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Quality issues in forensic science: a new perspective to support justice and innovation

Open access
Heavey, Anna, Houck, Max M., Turbett, Gavin R., Lewis, Simon W.·2024·Forensic Science International: Synergy

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100491

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Building consistent practice in this area benefits individual agencies in streamlining processes through objective and value‐adding decision making, along with cross‐agency benefits, such as the ability to benchmark operational quality metrics to drive improvements and inform resource allocation in business planning and strategic management.

    “Building consistent practice in this area benefits individual agencies in streamlining processes through objective and value‐adding decision making, along with cross‐agency benefits, such as the ability to benchmark operational quality metrics to drive improvements and inform resource allocation in business planning and strategic management [42].”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Heavey, A., Houck, M. M., Turbett, G. R., & Lewis, S. W.
Affiliations
  • Curtin University (AU)
  • Florida International University (US)
  • Pathwest Laboratory Medicine (AU)
Corresponding author
Heavey, Anna
Venue
Forensic Science International: Synergy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024
Volume
8
Pages
100491
ISSN
2589-871X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402289462
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
7.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Forensic Science International Synergy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal processes and jurisprudence
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Keywords
forensic evidence reliability, justice, quality assurance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review