Cited by 35Concrete and Cement Materials ResearchCoal and Its By-productsWaste Management and Environmental Impact

Beneficiation of Collie fly ash for synthesis of geopolymer: Part 1 – Beneficiation

van Riessen, Arie, Chen-Tan, Nigel·2013·Fuel

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.11.070

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • With correct formulation and proper curing, the compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymers can reach values ≥100 MPa.

    “With the correct formulation and proper curing process, the compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymers can reach values ≥100 MPa [11,12,13,14,15].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Riessen, A., & Chen-Tan, N.
Venue
Fuel
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
106
Pages
569-575
ISSN
0016-2361 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110804323
Cited by
35
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
FWCI
10.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Fuel (publishedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Coal and Its By-products
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Waste Management and Environmental Impact
Keywords
fly ash beneficiation, geopolymer, coal fly ash, magnetic separation, sieving, milling, surface area, amorphous iron, fly ash reactivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review