Cited by 29Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesThermal and Kinetic AnalysisCoal Properties and Utilization

A single model-free rate expression describing both non-isothermal and isothermal pyrolysis of Norway spruce

Samuelsson, Lina N., Babler, Matthaus U., Moriana, Rosana·2015·Fuel

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.08.019

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Samuelsson, L. N., Babler, M. U., & Moriana, R.
Affiliations
KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Corresponding author
Samuelsson, Lina N.
Venue
Fuel
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
161
Pages
59-67
ISSN
0016-2361 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1127199533
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Fuel (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Swedish Energy Agency
  • Wallenberg and Lars-Erik Thunholm Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal and Kinetic Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Coal Properties and Utilization
Keywords
pyrolysis kinetics, Norway spruce, biomass pyrolysis, model-free kinetics, non-isothermal thermogravimetry, heating rate effects, reaction rate equation, integral method, temperature profiles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review