An extensive characterization of various treated waste wood for assessment of suitability with combustion process
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The classification threshold was set at 16 or 10 correctly classified scans out of 32 (50% and around 30%) because there is high variability in the material.
“We have decided to set a classification threshold of 16 or 10 correctly classified scans (out of 32), i.e. 50% and around 30% of the total number of scans.It is imperative for the success of the classification that we allow for a lower threshold than 100%, as there is a high variability in the material [15,16].”
From Classification of waste wood categories according to the best reuse using FT-NIR spectroscopy and chemometrics (2023) · cites this paper as [15]
Huron et al. confirmed the heterogeneity of treated wood material, with properties quite different among the different classes of the waste wood characterized.
“In their study Huron et al. confirmed the heterogeneity of treated wood material, with properties quite different among the different classes of the waste wood characterized.”
From Classification of waste wood categories according to the best reuse using FT-NIR spectroscopy and chemometrics (2023) · cites this paper as [15]
Cites
Helsen, L., & Van den Bulck, E. (2005) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2004.07.025 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mancini, M., & Rinnan, Å. (2023) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2023.341564 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Mancini, M., Taavitsainen, V.-M., & Rinnan, Å. (2024) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2024.02.033 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Huron, M., Oukala, S., Lardière, J., Giraud, N., & Dupont, C.
- Affiliations
- Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Dupont, Capucine
- ORCID
- Dupont, Capucine
- Venue
- Fuel
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 202
- Pages
- 118-128
- ISSN
- 0016-2361 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2606881559
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Fuel (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agricultural and Food Sciences
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
- Keywords
- wood combustion, particleboard, painted wood, heavy metals, nitrogen content, minor elements, impregnated wood, wood preservatives, gas emissions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
