Cited by 54Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesBioenergy crop production and managementCoal Combustion and Slurry Processing

The potential for production of high quality bio-coal from early harvested Miscanthus by hydrothermal carbonisation

Open access
Smith, Aidan Mark, Whittaker, Carly, Shield, Ian, Ross, Andrew Barry·2018·Fuel

Abstract

To meet combustion quality requirements, Miscanthus is conventionally harvested in late winter/early spring after senescence due to a lowering of fuel nitrogen, chlorine and ash content. This can overcome combustion issues such as slagging, fouling and corrosion however there is a significant reduction in dry matter yields compared to early harvesting in the autumn. In this study, Miscanthus × giganteus harvested conventionally (after senescence) and early (green) have been pre-treated by hydrothermal carbonisation (HTC) at 200 °C and 250 °C. HTC at 200 °C improves the grindability of the biomass but results in limited energy densification. HTC at 250 °C results in increased energy densification producing a bio-coal with a HHV ranging from 27 to 28 MJ/kg for early and 25 to 26 MJ/kg for conventional harvesting; the Hardgrove Grindability Index (HGI) increases from 0 to 150. At higher HTC temperatures, the combustion profile of the bio-coal exhibits a ‘coal like’ single stage combustion profile. HTC results in a significant reduction in alkali metal content, increases safe combustion temperatures and reduces the theoretical propensity of the derived fuel to slag, foul and corrode. The results indicate that HTC can valorise both conventional and early harvested Miscanthus without producing any adverse effect on the yields and quality of the bio-coal. The challenges associated with early harvesting of Miscanthus appear to be largely overcome by HTC resulting in increased yields of up to 40% per hectare due to reduction in dry matter loss.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.01.143

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Lewandowski I, Heinz A. Delayed harvest of miscanthus-influences on biomass quantity and quality and environmental impacts of energy production. Eur J Agron 2003;19:45-63.
  2. Yates NE, Riche AB, Shield I, Zapater M, Ferchaud F, Ragaglini G, Roncucci N. Investigating the long-term biomass yield of miscanthus giganteus and switchgrass when harvested as a green energy feedstock. In: 23rd European biomass conference and exhibition, Vienna, Austria; 2015. p. 61-7.
  3. Kahle P, Beuch S, Boelcke B, Leinweber P, Schulten H-R. Cropping of Miscanthus in Central Europe: biomass production and influence on nutrients and soil organic matter. Eur J Agron 2001;15:171-84.
  4. Gezan SA, Riche AB. Over-winter decline in switchgrass and miscanthus. Aspects Appl Biol 2008;90:219.
  5. Godin B, Lamaudière S, Agneessens R, Schmit T, Goffart J-P, Stilmant D, et al. Chemical characteristics and biofuel potential of several vegetal biomasses grown under a wide range of environmental conditions. Ind Crops Prod 2013;48:1-12.
  6. Roncucci N, Di Nasso NO, Tozzini C, Bonari E, Ragaglini G. Miscanthus× giganteus nutrient concentrations and uptakes in autumn and winter harvests as influenced by soil texture, irrigation and nitrogen fertilization in the Mediterranean. GCB Bioenergy 2015;7:1009-18.
  7. Mayer F, Gerin PA, Noo A, Lemaigre S, Stilmant D, Schmit T, et al. Assessment of energy crops alternative to maize for biogas production in the Greater Region. Bioresour Technol 2014;166:358-67.
  8. Kiesel A, Lewandowski I. Miscanthus as biogas substrate -cutting tolerance and potential for anaerobic digestion. GCB Bioenergy 2017;9:153-67.
  9. Emery IR, Mosier NS. The impact of dry matter loss during herbaceous biomass storage on net greenhouse gas emissions from biofuels production. Biomass Bioenergy 2012;39:237-46.
  10. Libra JA, Ro KS, Kammann C, Funke A, Berge ND, Neubauer Y, et al. Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass residuals: a comparative review of the chemistry, pro- cesses and applications of wet and dry pyrolysis. Biofuels 2011;2:71-106.
  11. Kambo HS, Dutta A. A comparative review of biochar and hydrochar in terms of production, physico-chemical properties and applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2015;45:359-78.
  12. Funke A, Ziegler F. Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass: a summary and dis- cussion of chemical mechanisms for process engineering. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 2010;4:160-77.
  13. Smith AM, Singh S, Ross AB. Fate of inorganic material during hydrothermal car- bonisation of biomass: influence of feedstock on combustion behaviour of hydro- char. Fuel 2016;169:135-45.
  14. Ekpo U, Ross AB, Camargo-Valero MA, Fletcher LA. Influence of pH on hydro- thermal treatment of swine manure: impact on extraction of nitrogen and phos- phorus in process water. Bioresour Technol 2016;214:637-44.
  15. Ekpo U, Ross AB, Camargo-Valero MA, Williams PT. A comparison of product yields and inorganic content in process streams following thermal hydrolysis and hydro- thermal processing of microalgae, manure and digestate. Bioresour Technol 2016;200:951-60.
  16. Purdy SJ, Cunniff J, Maddison AL, Jones LE, Barraclough T, Castle M, et al. Seasonal carbohydrate dynamics and climatic regulation of senescence in the perennial grass, Miscanthus. BioEnergy Res 2015;8:28-41.
  17. Shield I, Barraclough TJP, Riche AB, Yates NE. Growing the energy crop miscanthus for 22 years. Asp Appl Biol 2015;128:173-9.
  18. Jenkins B, Baxter L, Miles T. Combustion properties of biomass. Fuel Process Technol 1998;54:17-46.
  19. Ndibe C, Vonk G, Yuan S, Maier J, Scheffknecht G. Characterizing the grinding behavior of pre-treated biomass fuels for coal pulverizer application. In: Proceedings of 24th European biomass conference and exhibition; 2016. p. 457-65.
  20. Bridgeman TG, Jones JM, Williams A, Waldron DJ. An investigation of the grind- ability of two torrefied energy crops. Fuel 2010;89:3911-8.
  21. Schuhmacher JP, Huntjens FJ, Van Krevelen DW. Chemical structure and properties of coal XXVI studies on artificial coalification. Fuel 1960;39:223-34.
  22. Hatcher PG, Breger IA, Szeverenyi N, Maciel GE. Nuclear magnetic resonance stu- dies of ancient buried wood-II. Observations on the origin of coal from lignite to bituminous coal. Org Geochem 1982;4:9-18.
  23. van der Weijde T, Kiesel A, Iqbal Y, Muylle H, Dolstra O, Visser RGF, et al. Evaluation of Miscanthus sinensis biomass quality as feedstock for conversion into different bioenergy products. GCB Bioenergy 2017;9:176-90.
  24. Smith AM, Ross AB. Production of bio-coal, bio-methane and fertilizer from sea- weed via hydrothermal carbonisation. Algal Research 2016;16:1-11.
  25. Tillman DA, Duong DNB, Harding NS. Chapter 4 -blending coal with biomass: cofiring biomass with coal. In: Tillman DA, Duong DNB, Harding NS, editors. Solid fuel blending. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2012. p. 125-200.
  26. Su S, Pohl JH, Holcombe D, Hart JA. Techniques to determine ignition, flame sta- bility and burnout of blended coals in p.f. power station boilers. Prog Energy Combust Sci 2001;27:75-98.
  27. Yang H, Yan R, Chen H, Lee DH, Zheng C. Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 2007;86:1781-8.
  28. Saddawi A, Jones JM, Williams A. Influence of alkali metals on the kinetics of the thermal decomposition of biomass. Fuel Process Technol 2012;104:189-97.
  29. Koppejan J, Van Loo S. The handbook of biomass combustion and co-firing. Routledge; 2012.
  30. Müller M, Wolf K-J, Smeda A, Hilpert K. Release of K, Cl, and S species during Co- combustion of coal and straw. Energy Fuels 2006;20:1444-9.
  31. Mäkelä M, Yoshikawa K. Ash behavior during hydrothermal treatment for solid fuel applications. Part 2: Effects of treatment conditions on industrial waste biomass. Energy Convers Manage 2016;121:409-14.
  32. Grimm A, Skoglund N, Boström D, Ohman M. Bed agglomeration characteristics in fluidized quartz bed combustion of phosphorus-rich biomass fuels. Energy Fuels 2011;25:937-47.
  33. Riedl R, Dahl J, Obernberger I, Narodoslawsky M. Corrosion in fire tube boilers of biomass combustion plants. In: Proceedings of the China International Corrosion Control Conference 1999; 1999.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, A. M., Whittaker, C., Shield, I., & Ross, A. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • Rothamsted Research (GB)
Corresponding author
Ross, Andrew Barry
Venue
Fuel
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
220
Pages
546-557
ISSN
0016-2361 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2792397933
Cited by
54
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fuel (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository) (submittedVersion)
  • Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/J017302, EP/I014365/1, EP/G036608/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Coal Combustion and Slurry Processing
Keywords
Miscanthus × giganteus, hydrothermal carbonization, bio-coal, early harvest, biomass pretreatment, energy densification, grindability, alkali metal reduction, slagging and fouling, combustion quality, dry matter yield, lignocellulosic biomass valorization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review