Cited by 27Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesThermal and Kinetic AnalysisCoal and Coke Industries Research

On the self-heating behavior of upgraded biochar pellets blended with pyrolysis oil: Effects of process parameters

Open access
Riva, Lorenzo, Cardarelli, Alessandro, Andersen, Geir Johan, Buø, Therese Videm, Barbanera, Marco, Bartocci, Pietro, Fantozzi, Francesco, Nielsen, Henrik Kofoed·2020·Fuel

Abstract

Biochar obtained from biomass pyrolysis is a promising carbon neutral material which can be used in substitution of fossil coal and coke in metallurgical applications. Biochar’s mechanical properties improve significantly without compromising reactivity, when upgraded by densification with pyrolysis oil and reheated. However, upgraded biochar pellets use in the industry is limited due to the risks associated with self-heating. This issue must be seriously considered for further industrial production of upgraded biochar pellets. Self-heating oven tests are generally time-consuming and limit the possibility of testing various potential solutions. The aim of this work was both to investigate the self-heating behavior of densified biochar and to possibly substitute the standard oven test with a fast and cost-effective thermogravimetric analysis. This was done by using Response Surface Methodology, where pyrolysis temperature, oil content and treatment temperature were selected as independent variables. By statistical analysis it was possible to understand that self-heating risk can be drastically reduced by upgrading the pellets at high temperatures (i.e. re-heating). In addition, through the analysis of the initial combustion temperature, the maximum weight loss rate and the activation energy (considered as responses of the model), it was possible to understand how to predict the results of the self-heating oven tests through thermogravimetric analysis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118395

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Oxygen deprivation during pyrolysis can exacerbate reactive functional groups, while low-temperature biochars like B600 retain surface tars that initiate thermal runaway.

    “Oxygen deprivation during pyrolysis can exacerbate reactive functional groups, while low-temperature biochars like B600 retain surface tars that initiate thermal runaway [39,110,111].”

    From Pilot-Scale Slow Pyrolysis, Post-Heat Treatment, and Self-Heating Performance of Biochar Fuels Derived from Construction, Renovation, and Demolition (CRD) Wood Waste (2026) · cites this paper as [111]

    Section 3.7 reports greater self-heating risk for pellets made with biochar pyrolyzed at 450 °C than at 600 or 750 °C. Section 3.5 also says added pyrolysis oil can make pellets ignite faster. Neither passage attributes that risk to oxygen deprivation, reactive functional groups, or surface tars retained by a material called B600; the oil studied was added as a binder. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Monsen B, Lindstad T, Tuset JK. CO2 emissions from the production of ferrosilicon and silicon metal in Norway. 56th Electric furnace conference proceedings, New Orleans, USA. 1998. p. 371-8.
  2. Monsen B, Grønli M, Nygaard L, Tveit H, "The use of biocarbon in Norwegian ferroalloy production," presented at the INFACON 9, Quebec City, Canada, 2001, pp. 268-76.
  3. Drysdale D. An introduction to fire dynamics. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2011.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Riva, L., Cardarelli, A., Andersen, G. J., Buø, T. V., Barbanera, M., Bartocci, P., Fantozzi, F., & Nielsen, H. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Agder (NO)
  • Università degli Studi della Tuscia (IT)
  • University of Perugia (IT)
Corresponding author
Riva, Lorenzo
Venue
Fuel
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
278
Pages
118395
ISSN
0016-2361 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3035846526
Cited by
27
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fuel (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UnitusOpen (Tuscia University) (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of Agder
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal and Kinetic Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Coal and Coke Industries Research
Keywords
self-heating, bio-oil, densification, reheating, oven test, thermogravimetric analysis, response surface methodology, pyrolysis temperature, activation energy, coke substitution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review