Cited by 97Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesCoal and Coke Industries ResearchIron and Steelmaking Processes

Influence of pyrolysis conditions and the nature of the wood on the quality of charcoal as a reducing agent

Open access
Dufourny, A., Van De Steene, L., Humbert, G., Guibal, D., Martin, L., Blin, J.·2019·Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis

Abstract

The production of charcoal for metallurgical applications requires careful selection of the wood and control of the pyrolysis conditions to ensure acceptable charcoal quality. The main properties of charcoal to be considered are density, mechanical strength, and reactivity. In this study, charcoal was produced from two types of wood commonly used in the industry, Eucalyptus globulus (eucalyptus) and Picea abies (spruce), in a pilot scale pyrolysis fixed bed reactor at three temperatures (500, 650 and 800 °C) and two solid residence times (0 and 90 min). The yields, composition, apparent density, true density, porosity, carbon structural ordering, friability, compressive strength and CO2 reactivity of the resulting charcoals were analyzed. A new method to test compressive strength was applied to a charcoal bed. Our results show that the nature of the wood has a much greater impact on these values than the pyrolysis operating conditions. Wood apparent density is not a good indicator of the mechanical behavior of charcoal. Despite its higher density, eucalyptus charcoal showed lower mechanical stability than spruce charcoal independently of the pyrolysis conditions. When the final pyrolysis temperature was increased, the mechanical strength, porosity of the charcoal increased and CO2 reactivity decreased. The impact of solid residence time during pyrolysis on the charcoal properties was negligible except for CO2 reactivity, which decreased with an increase in residence time.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaap.2018.10.013

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher bulk density could reduce biochar friability, making it denser and more resistant to weathering due to ordered crystallite formation.

    “Higher bulk density could reduce biochar friability, making it denser and more resistant to weathering due to ordered crystallite formation [79].”

    From Pilot-Scale Slow Pyrolysis, Post-Heat Treatment, and Self-Heating Performance of Biochar Fuels Derived from Construction, Renovation, and Demolition (CRD) Wood Waste (2026) · cites this paper as [79]

    Section 3.4.2 and the Conclusions link greater structural ordering and true density to lower friability in spruce charcoal. The paper does not establish that higher bulk density has this effect generally, and it does not assess resistance to weathering. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Increased heat treatment severity and devolatilization led to more micropore formation with reduced meso- and macropores, alongside shrinkage and volume reduction.

    “Increased heat treatment severity and devolatilization led to more micropore formation with reduced meso-and macropores, alongside shrinkage and volume reduction [79].”

    From Pilot-Scale Slow Pyrolysis, Post-Heat Treatment, and Self-Heating Performance of Biochar Fuels Derived from Construction, Renovation, and Demolition (CRD) Wood Waste (2026) · cites this paper as [79]

    Section 3.4.1 reports earlier findings of reduced charcoal volume and smaller pores at higher pyrolysis temperatures, which partly supports the claim. But the paper does not establish increased micropores or reduced meso- and macropores; Section 3.2 reports that overall porosity increased from 500 to 800 °C. It also describes volatile release producing large cracks and voids in eucalyptus charcoal, rather than a general reduction in large pores. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • High pyrolysis temperatures and BRT reduce VC and reactivity.

    “High pyrolysis temperatures and BRT reduce VC and reactivity [79,108,109].”

    From Pilot-Scale Slow Pyrolysis, Post-Heat Treatment, and Self-Heating Performance of Biochar Fuels Derived from Construction, Renovation, and Demolition (CRD) Wood Waste (2026) · cites this paper as [79]

    Section 3.1 reports that volatile-matter content falls as pyrolysis temperature and solid residence time increase. Section 3.5 reports lower CO₂ reactivity at higher temperatures, but the residence-time effect was significant only for spruce charcoal at 800 °C; no significant effect was observed for eucalyptus charcoal. The claim overgeneralizes the effect of residence time on reactivity. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. T. Kuppens, M. Van Dael, K. Vanreppelen, R. Carleer, J. Yperman, S. Schreurs and S. Van Passel, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 37, (2014).
  2. G. Fick, O. Mirgaux, P. Neau and F. Patisson, Environmental Assessment of Biomass Options for Ironmaking, at: Carbon Management Technology Conference, 2012,
  3. M. Tangstad and M. Gasik, in Handbook of Ferroalloys, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 2013, p. 179.
  4. C. Isbaex, Influência da densidade do carvão vegetal na produção de Silício Metálico, Master thesis Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 2014,
  5. E.S. Noumi, P. Rousset, A.d.C.O. Carneiro and J. Blin, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 118, (2016) 278.
  6. M. Subramanian and C.N. Harman, Problems and Prospects of carbonaceous reducing agents in ferro alloys production, at: Proceedings of the Seminar on Problems and Prospects of Ferro-Alloy Industry in India, NML, Jamshedpur, October 24-26 1983, 133.
  7. M.R. Assis, Mechanical and physical properties of Eucalyptus charcoal from pyrolysis under different conditions, Ph.D thesis Universidade federal de Lavras, 2016,
  8. L. Wang, B. Hovd, H.-H. Bui, A.M. Valderhaug, T. Videm Buø, R.G. Birkeland, Ø. Skreiberg and K.-Q. Tran, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 50, (2016) 55.
  9. J.M. Paull and J.B. See, Journal of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 79, (1978) 35.
  10. J. Chrzazvez, I. Théry-Parisot, G. Fiorucci, J.-F. Terral and B. Thibaut, Journal of Archaeological Science, 44, (2014) 30.
  11. Y. Elmay, Y.L. Brech, L. Delmotte, A. Dufour, N. Brosse and R. Gadiou, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 113, (2015) 402.
  12. M. Connor, M. Viljoen and J. Ilic, in Developments in Thermochemical Biomass Conversion, Springer, 1997, p. 82.
  13. Z. Ma, Y. Yang, Q. Ma, H. Zhou, X. Luo, X. Liu and S. Wang, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 127, (2017) 350.
  14. J. Pastor-Villegas, J.M. Rodríguez, J. Pastor-Valle and M.G. García, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 80, (2007) 507.
  15. B. Clair and B. Thibaut, Iawa Journal, 22, (2001) 121.
  16. M. Kumar and R.C. Gupta, Journal of Materials Science, 30, (1995) 544.
  17. E.S. Noumi, J. Blin and P. Rousset, Optimization of quality of charcoal for steelmaking using statistical analysis approach, at: 5th International Conference on Engineering for Waste and Biomass

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dufourny, A., Van De Steene, L., Humbert, G., Guibal, D., Martin, L., & Blin, J.
Affiliations
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR)
Corresponding author
Blin, J.
Venue
Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
137
Pages
1-13
ISSN
0165-2370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898031601
Cited by
97
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Agritrop (Cirad) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Coal and Coke Industries Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Iron and Steelmaking Processes
Keywords
charcoal, pyrolysis conditions, Eucalyptus globulus, Norway spruce, wood species, pyrolysis temperature, solids residence time, compressive strength, porosity, CO2 reactivity, apparent density, true density, friability, fixed-bed reactor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review