Cited by 34High-Temperature Coating BehaviorsAdvanced Power Generation TechnologiesCoal Combustion and Slurry Processing

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

Control of ash deposition in solid fuel fired boiler

Naganuma, Hiroshi, Ikeda, Nobuya, Ito, Tadashi, Satake, Hideshi, Matsuura, Mikio, Ueki, Yasuaki, Yoshiie, Ryo, Naruse, Ichiro·2013·Fuel Processing Technology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fuproc.2011.09.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Ninomiya, 1998, Evaluation of melting and deposition phenomena of coal ash on boiler (in Japanese), Journal of the Japan Institute of Energy, 77, 177
  2. Naruse, 2005, Fundamental ash deposition characteristics in pulverized coal reaction under high temperature conditions, Fuel, 84, 405, 10.1016/j.fuel.2004.09.007 · DOI
  3. Rushdi, 2005, Mechanistic prediction of ash deposition in a pilot-scale test facility, Fuel, 84, 1246, 10.1016/j.fuel.2004.08.027 · DOI
  4. Pronobis, 2005, Evaluation of the influence of biomass co-combustion on boiler furnace slagging by means of fusibility correlations, Biomass Bioenergy, 28, 375, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.11.003 · DOI
  5. Naganuma, 2009, Control of ash deposition in pulverized coal-fired boiler, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 32, 2709, 10.1016/j.proci.2008.06.001 · DOI
  6. Naganuma, 2009, Elucidation of ash deposition mechanisms with interfacial reaction (in Japanese), Journal of the Japan Institute of Energy, 88, 816, 10.3775/jie.88.816 · DOI
  7. Valero, 1996, Ash fouling in coal-fired utility boilers. Monitoring and optimization of on-load cleaning, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 22, 189, 10.1016/0360-1285(96)00004-4 · DOI
  8. Kihara, 1988, Recent plant experience and research into fireside corrosion in Japan, Materials and Corrosion, 39, 69, 10.1002/maco.19880390208 · DOI
  9. Scandrett, 1984, Thermodynamics of alkali removal from coal-derived gases, Journal of Institute Energy, 57, 391
  10. Benavidez, 2003, Densification of ashes from a thermal power plant, Ceramics International, 29, 61, 10.1016/S0272-8842(02)00090-1 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 34

Metadata

Authors
Naganuma, H., Ikeda, N., Ito, T., Satake, H., Matsuura, M., Ueki, Y., Yoshiie, R., & Naruse, I.
Affiliations
  • Tohoku Electric Power Co., Inc. (Japan) (JP)
  • Nippon Welding Rod Co., Ltd. (Japan) (JP)
  • Nagoya University (JP)
Corresponding author
Naganuma, Hiroshi
Venue
Fuel Processing Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-01
Volume
105
Pages
77-81
ISSN
0378-3820 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965290203
Cited by
34
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Fuel Processing Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › High-Temperature Coating Behaviors
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Energy Engineering and Power Technology › Advanced Power Generation Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Coal Combustion and Slurry Processing
Keywords
ash deposition, thermal spraying, cement clinker, field testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review