Cited by 185Data Quality and ManagementBig Data Technologies and ApplicationsBig Data and Business Intelligence

A Data Quality in Use model for Big Data

Merino, Jorge, Caballero, Ismael, Rivas, Bibiano, Serrano, Manuel, Piattini, Mario·2016·Future Generation Computer Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.future.2015.11.024

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preemptive screening and training of data workers produced better quality data than what would typically be achieved through automated post-processing of noisy data.

    “For example, Mitra et al. [49] and Thakkar et al. [70] discussed the importance of preparatory measures in the form of screening and training of data workers, with Mitra et al. [49] finding that this preemptive approach produced better quality data than what would typically be achieved through automated post-processing of noisy data.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Merino, J., Caballero, I., Rivas, B., Serrano, M., & Piattini, M.
Affiliations
University of Castilla-La Mancha (ES)
Corresponding author
Merino, Jorge
Venue
Future Generation Computer Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
63
Pages
123-130
ISSN
0167-739X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2195118355
Cited by
185
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
22.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Future Generation Computer Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Economa y Competitividad and Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional FEDER (TIN2012-37493-C03-01)
  • Consejera de Educacin, Ciencia y Cultura de la Junta de Comunidades de Castilla La Mancha, y Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional FEDER (PEII11-0327-7035)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Data Quality and Management
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Big Data Technologies and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Big Data and Business Intelligence
Keywords
data quality, quality in use, big data, data quality model, business intelligence, data quality management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review