Cited by 112IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingCaching and Content DeliveryCloud Computing and Remote Desktop Technologies

Recovery for overloaded mobile edge computing

Satria, Dimas, Park, Daihee, Jo, Minho·2017·Future Generation Computer Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.future.2016.06.024

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Different network architectures will be required for different edge computing scenarios.

    “Different network architectures will also be required for these different scenarios [125,133,144,204].”

    From Edge AI: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [204]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Satria, D., Park, D., & Jo, M.
Affiliations
Korea University (KR)
Corresponding author
Jo, Minho
Venue
Future Generation Computer Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
70
Pages
138-147
ISSN
0167-739X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2472738043
Cited by
112
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 1
FWCI
16.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Future Generation Computer Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
Korea University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Caching and Content Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Cloud Computing and Remote Desktop Technologies
Keywords
mobile edge computing, system failure recovery, workload offloading, quality of experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review